Power-Energy Relationship

  • Thread starter danielu13
  • Start date
  • #1
67
0
I was looking at the mass-energy relationship equation, which by taking the derivative I would think that you you should get a power-energy relationship. What I get is:

[itex]P = \frac{mc^2}{2\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}*2a[/itex]

If this were to be true, a particle without acceleration would have no power, and thus release no energy. Or, it could be that all of the energy is instantaneously released and shows no power. Can someone help me where I went wrong in this?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
russ_watters
Mentor
19,791
6,192
You figured correctly: no power is expended to keep an object moving at constant speed in a lossless environment.
 
  • #3
67
0
But is there any way of figuring the power produced by the destruction of mass, as in the mass-energy relationship?
 
  • #4
russ_watters
Mentor
19,791
6,192
No, it depends on how fast it is produced.
 
  • #5
67
0
So the conversion between matter and energy is not instantaneous then?
 
  • #6
87
0
If it was, there would be infinite power for an infinitely short time.

Conversion of mass to energy means the mass would no longer exist.

When a photon is emitted, it does not accelerate, it moves at c instantaneously.

My guess is that the consideration of power in this case is not meaningful.
 
  • #7
87
0
I was looking at the mass-energy relationship equation, which by taking the derivative I would think that you you should get a power-energy relationship. What I get is:

[itex]P = \frac{mc^2}{2\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}*2a[/itex]
A power energy relationship is time.

The derivative would be a power vs mass relationship.

I do find it an interesting thought.
 
  • #8
russ_watters
Mentor
19,791
6,192
So the conversion between matter and energy is not instantaneous then?
On a molecular or atomic level I think it is -- therefore power is meaningless because as said it would be infinite or undefined.

I have, however seen people calculate power using a propagation rate or reaction rate of even a very fast reaction such as in a bomb. It provides interesting hyperbole but I don't think it is really all that useful.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Power-Energy Relationship

Replies
0
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
49K
Replies
2
Views
662
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
821
Replies
6
Views
19K
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
10K
Top