but...i don't know if I'm going in the right direction, for my teacher is horrible, and i don't know where to go from here if i am going in the right direction
Of course there is! (hopefully you meant without a calculator) That's why the angle is given to you in radians, as a rational multiple of [itex]\pi[/itex].
Draw the unit circle: what coordinate points do certain angles represent? [itex]\pi, \frac{\pi}{6}, \frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] etc.
but 5pi/12 isn't on my unit circle...the one's you listed are though...i just don't get how exactly you can find 5pi/12 with information of pi/2, etc...
Yeah, sorry if I gave you the wrong idea. 1/4 is incorrect. You are making the assumption that if I halve the angle, I halve the sine. You can see why that would only be true for a linear relationship right? (which sine is not). I think Sirus has the right technique, since the trig identity involves a term with twice the angle and another with just the angle itself. We know how to work with [itex]\frac{\pi}{6}[/itex], and multiples of it, so find the cosine of the angle [itex]\frac{\5pi}{6}[/itex] and work from there.