Hi all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have recently completed two courses in general relativity and am well versed in things like the ray chaudhuri equation, tetrads, etc. I had to give a 2hr talk on gravitational radiation to my class and so understand GWs at some relatively respectable level. What I am inquiring about is the formulation of the perturbation metric in a precise sense. What literature normally says is, $$g_{ab} = \eta_{ab} + h_{ab},$$ where $$h_{ab}\ll \eta_{ab}$$ for non-zero elements. What I want to know is whether there is a more precise definition of "small". More to the point is there a more fundamental point of view for using perturbation theory and when it is valid in differential geometry or math in general. Feel free to use big words ;)

J. Albert

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Precise formuation of perturbations in GR

Loading...

Similar Threads - Precise formuation perturbations | Date |
---|---|

I Do gravitational waves perturb electromagnetic fields? | Dec 1, 2017 |

Very precise Michelson-Morley experiments | Oct 10, 2015 |

Inside event horizon, space and time are reversed. How, precisely ? | Jun 28, 2014 |

Calculating gravity with high precision ? | Nov 24, 2013 |

Mathematically precise formulation of Ehlers-Geren-Sachs theorem | Dec 17, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**