Can the Future Be Predicted with 100% Accuracy Using Particle Properties?

In summary: You can't know the future.In summary, the conversation discussed the possibility of accurately predicting the future if one knew the exact position and velocity of every particle. However, this statement is not applicable in quantum mechanics as the exact position and velocity do not exist. The conversation also touched upon the limitations of classical mechanics and the probabilistic nature of the quantum world. Ultimately, it was concluded that the future cannot be known with 100% accuracy due to the uncertainty principle and the collapse of the wavefunction.
  • #1
Chas3down
60
0
I was watching a tv show and they stated...

If you know the exact position and velocity of every particle you can accuratly predict the future for the rest of time.

However I know that you cannot know the exact position AND velocity of a sub atomic particle.

How accurate is the first statement if it were possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In classical mechanics, and purely theoretical, this statement can be valid. Chaos theory ruins any attempt to make this real, however. And quantum mechanics tells us that "the exact position and velocity" do not even exist (it is not a problem of our limited knowledge!).

If you know the wavefunction of every particle exactly, you can predict the future in deterministic interpretations of quantum mechanics (again, in theory, as chaos still ruins everything) - but even then the predictions (like many worlds) won't be like classical predictions.
 
  • #3
If WHAT were possible? If you knew the exact position and velocity? If you could accurately [exactly] predict?
As mfb has said, there is a problem with the concept. In no particular order, let's talk about some of them: Science works because most things obey continuity and differentiability relations. Meaning a small difference in initial state not only leads to a small difference in resulting state, but actually converges to smaller differences (by some measure) in resulting state. Chaos theory, shows that this is not true, that small differences will (in some very, very simple systems) diverge (to one or many or infinite numbers of very different resulting states). We know that the world is NOT described by classical nor by non-relativistic quantum physics. The equations of relativistic quantum field theory are not, in general, soluble exactly. The equations can only be solved for the most simple (symmetric) systems. Consider the three body problem. The solution is NOT analytic. Consider that most numbers are transcendental, implying that the computer's memory requirement to store "the exact" position (or velocity) of just a single particle is infinite, requiring all of the matter in the Universe to record it in order to proceed with the calculations. Then consider the number of particles, both real and virtual. Consider a REAL isolated system. To what degree is it actually isolated from the rest of the Universe? Is it shielded from black body radiation? from neutrinos? from gravity? No, it isn't...not even close.
-=-=-
The easiest answer is that the world is quantum and PROBABILISTIC, there are NO hidden variables which, if we knew them, would reduce the probabilities to 0 and 1. That is, for each instant of time, the probabilities multiply based on the previous instant's "exactitude". So, what is ∞ * ∞ * ∞ * ... ? How do you compute that? Your first statement was based on a "Classical Physics" world view which is known to NOT be correct.
 
  • #4
mfb said:
In classical mechanics, and purely theoretical, this statement can be valid. Chaos theory ruins any attempt to make this real, however. And quantum mechanics tells us that "the exact position and velocity" do not even exist (it is not a problem of our limited knowledge!).

If you know the wavefunction of every particle exactly, you can predict the future in deterministic interpretations of quantum mechanics (again, in theory, as chaos still ruins everything) - but even then the predictions (like many worlds) won't be like classical predictions.

My guess is if you could predict the future with 100% accuracy, by whatever method, that would force the wavefunction to collapse because you have knowledge. Without the wavefunction the universe would end and everything would vanish. It is for this reason the future cannot be known. You can't know what numbers are going to be drawn in the Lottery when they're using a quantum mechanical process, like radioactive decay, to pick the numbers.
 

1. What are particles and how can they be used to predict the future?

Particles are tiny units of matter that make up everything in the universe. They can be used to predict the future by following the principles of quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of particles on a microscopic level. By understanding the state and movement of particles, we can make predictions about their future behavior.

2. Can particles be used to predict events on a larger scale, such as the weather?

Yes, particles can be used to predict events on a larger scale, such as the weather. By studying the behavior of particles in the Earth's atmosphere, scientists can make predictions about weather patterns and changes.

3. Are there limitations to predicting the future with particles?

Yes, there are limitations to predicting the future with particles. While quantum mechanics can accurately predict the behavior of particles on a microscopic level, it becomes increasingly difficult to make accurate predictions as we move to larger scales. Additionally, there are many complex factors that can influence the behavior of particles, making it difficult to make precise predictions.

4. How do scientists use particles to predict the future in other fields, such as economics or medicine?

In other fields, scientists may use particles to make predictions by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to different systems. For example, in economics, particles can be used to model the behavior of markets and make predictions about future trends. In medicine, particles can be used to study the behavior of cells and predict the development of diseases.

5. Can predicting the future with particles help us make important decisions?

While predicting the future with particles can provide valuable insights, it should not be relied on as the sole basis for making important decisions. There are many other factors that can influence events and outcomes, and it is important to consider a variety of sources when making decisions.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
922
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
840
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
190
Views
9K
Back
Top