Predicting tsunamis, what to measure from earthquake data?

In summary, the data that you need to predict tsunami possibility is the magnitude and depth of the earthquake, the location (latitude and longitude), fault geometry and type, and the water displacement.
  • #1
panxi
4
0
I have a project to create a program to predict tsunami possibility by gathering data and finding pattern from previous earthquakes. It would be using neural network. But I don't really know what I should consider from the data. Is it the magnitude that cause the tsunami? Or is it the depth level? Any other measurable data that I should consider?

Are there any specific textbook that cover this?

Btw, does anyone know any dataset that have both earthquake and tsunami occurences from the last 100 years?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Based on your questions it is hard to know where to start. Part of the problem is that a lot of relevant research is behind a paywall as well.

Suggestions:
It might be better to ask a researcher in the field you want (email that person).
Try: Chau An ---- use the email address (icon next to his name) in this abstract link (useful part of the paper is behind a paywall):

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018JC014363
See the video referenced in this post on PF to start thinking abut your project:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/tsunamis-and-earthquake-thrusts.747177/
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and panxi
  • #3
Magnitude, depth, location (latitude and longitude), fault geometry and type, are key elements/variables.

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-a-fault-and-what-are-different-types?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products

Earthquakes on land (away from coast) will not cause tsunamis. Earthquakes near the coast or underwater may cause tsunamis if a lot of a water is displaced.

Most tsunamis are generated by shallow, great earthquakes at subductions zones. More than 80% of the world's tsunamis occur in the Pacific along its Ring of Fire subduction zones.
http://itic.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1158&Itemid=2026
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and panxi
  • #4
Astronuc said:
Magnitude, depth, location (latitude and longitude), fault geometry and type, are key elements/variables.

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-a-fault-and-what-are-different-types?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products

Earthquakes on land (away from coast) will not cause tsunamis. Earthquakes near the coast or underwater may cause tsunamis if a lot of a water is displaced.http://itic.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1158&Itemid=2026

When you said location is one of the key element, what does it mean? How does the location of earthquake epicenter affect the tsunami occurence? Say, there's an earthquake occurs in Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean with same magnitude, depth, fault & type. Is the probability of the earthquake in Pacific different with that in Indian Ocean?
 
  • #5
panxi said:
When you said location is one of the key element, what does it mean? How does the location of earthquake epicenter affect the tsunami occurence? Say, there's an earthquake occurs in Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean with same magnitude, depth, fault & type. Is the probability of the earthquake in Pacific different with that in Indian Ocean?
It would be difficult to find two earthquakes nearly identical in all parameters considered, but one may start by comparing the characteristics of two earthquakes of similar magnitude, one in the Pacific Ocean and the other in the Indian Ocean.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tōhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami
Both earthquakes generated large tsunamis.

One could compare the tsunami of the lesser magnitude Chilean earthquakes in 2010 (Mag 8.8) and 2015 (Mag 8.3).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Chile_earthquakehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Illapel_earthquake#Tsunami
and the earthquake near Sumatra in 2012, which did not generate any significant tsunamis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Indian_Ocean_earthquakes#Tsunami_warnings
Consider the type of fault, magnitude and depth.

Also, one could research megathrust earthquakes starting with the most recent and working back in time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megathrust_earthquake
 
  • Like
Likes panxi and davenn
  • #6
panxi said:
When you said location is one of the key element, what does it mean? How does the location of earthquake epicenter affect the tsunami occurence?

Astro answered that in the text you quoted from him, did you not read it all ? 😉

Astronuc said:
Earthquakes on land (away from coast) will not cause tsunamis. Earthquakes near the coast or underwater may cause tsunamis if a lot of a water is displaced.
That's the basic importance as to whether a quake will produce a tsunami or not.
After that, ( as has been stated) it is the type of rupture.
Thrust earthquakes will produce tsunamis. The size of the tsunami is then related to the size of the rupture,
that is, the length and offset on the fault.

Strike-slip ruptures underwater are not likely to produce tsunamis as there is no or little vertical offset.

The problem is, faults are rarely pure thrust or strike-slip. Most times even the best thrust fault event will have some strike-slip motion and even the best strike-slip fault event is likely to have a little thrust movement.
And there is every variation imagineable between those two extremes.

Here's a fault I visited recently in the NE of the South Island of New Zealand. This is one of a number of faults that were both on-land ( mostly) and some were coastal that the combined rupturing produced a Mw7.8 event in November 2016.
This fault is partially on-land and runs offshore. It's mapped length is around 3km
The greatest offset observed is 2m vertical and 6m horizontal. It uplifted some 10km of coastline that once used to be submerged at high tide but now is well above high water level.

my photos
looking along a long section of the rupture
View is NW, uplifted side is seaward side. Around 1 - 1.5 metres beside me
IMG_9649sm.jpg


further NW along (~100m) the fault and at the largest vertical offset, ~ 2m
Sadly the dumping of rock from the various landslips has almost covered the fault
IMG_9652sm.jpg


Google Earth aerial view
Kaikoura faulting1.jpg


Kaikoura faulting2.JPG


This uplift produced a small tsunami along the coast of around 1m
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and panxi
  • #7
There is also the possibility of an earthquake-destabilised slope-failure causing a tsunami, which seems to be what happened recently in Indonesia.

If you count the 'slosh' from massive falls into lakes as a tsunami, you have the double-jeopardy that one quake may create a rock/ice dam forming a lake, then an after-shock drops a further zillion tons into that. Slosh swamps shore-line, may catastrophically over-top and erode dam, empty lake into valley below. Potential 'domino' effects...
{ Brrr... }
 
  • #8
Nik_2213 said:
There is also the possibility of an earthquake-destabilised slope-failure causing a tsunami, which seems to be what happened recently in Indonesia.

really ? which one was that ? ...
there was a very recent tsunami in Indonesia related to slope failure of the
Anak Krakatau volcano in the Sunda Strait but it wasn't earthquake initiated.

The only case of that in recent years was ~ 23 years ago on the north coast on New Guinea, PNG
where a ~M7.1 produced a 10-12m tsunami when it really shouldn't have. Further investigation found
that the quake has caused a significant undersea landslide on the shelf.
 
  • #10
Nik_2213 said:
https://blogs.agu.org/landslideblog/2018/10/01/2018-sulawesi-earthquake-1/

That's the Palu event. There's a LOT more scary, but fascinating (IMHO) material on that site.
yeah but the landslide idea has not been proven 😉

There was some substantial land movement on land to the south of the city within the bounds of a relatively flat and swampy area that I saw on a different video some months ago
 
Last edited:
  • #11
With respect, video footage suggests the tsunami arose at a right-angle to the fault line rather than usual parallel. Also, it seemed to start after significant landslides on the flanks of the bay hit the water.
Such is but correlation, though, not causation...
YMMV.
--
"substantial land movement"
Agreed, any 'made ground' would be susceptible to subsidence and liquefaction, and soft ground would be especially vulnerable, per Mexico City's experience.
 
  • #12
Nik_2213 said:
With respect, video footage suggests the tsunami arose at a right-angle to the fault line rather than usual parallel. Also, it seemed to start after significant landslides on the flanks of the bay hit the water.
Such is but correlation, though, not causation...
YMMV.

don't know what video you were referring to ... 2 of the 3 videos in that link don't work

that doesn't negate the possibility of it being caused by strike slip motion given the right seafloor topography

Also, it seemed to start after significant landslides on the flanks of the bay hit the water.

what landslides ? again if there was actual video of that, in one of those 2 missing videos, it's no longer available
for me to view and make an assessment
 
  • #13
over 800 000 finds:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=tsunami+caused+by+landslide
this from the United States Geological Service (USGS.GOV):
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/how-do-la...s_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products
On July 9, 1958, a magnitude 7.9 earthquake on the Fairweather Fault triggered a rock avalanche at the head of Lituya Bay, Alaska. The landslide generated a wave that ran up 524 meters (1,719 feet) on the opposite shore and sent a 30-meter-high wave through Lituya Bay, sinking two fishing boats and killing two people.
 
  • #14
Tom.G said:
over 800 000 finds:
tsunami caused by landslide - Google Search
this from the United States Geological Service (USGS.GOV):
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/how-do-la...s_science_products=0#qt-news_science_productsOn July 9, 1958, a magnitude 7.9 earthquake on the Fairweather Fault triggered a rock avalanche at the head of Lituya Bay, Alaska. The landslide generated a wave that ran up 524 meters (1,719 feet) on the opposite shore and sent a 30-meter-high wave through Lituya Bay, sinking two fishing boats and killing two people.
Ohh dear

Tom,
I am not arguing against that... I know full well quakes can caused landslide induced tsunamis
I have been at this game for 40 years. I even stated a quake, landslide induced tsunami in an earlier post
:wink:Dave
 
  • #15
  • Like
Likes Tom.G

1. What is the relationship between earthquakes and tsunamis?

Tsunamis are often caused by large earthquakes that occur under the ocean floor. The sudden movement of the Earth's crust can displace a large amount of water, resulting in a tsunami.

2. What type of earthquake data is used to predict tsunamis?

Scientists use several types of data to predict tsunamis, including the location, depth, and magnitude of an earthquake. They also look at the direction and amount of movement on the fault line, as well as the duration of the earthquake.

3. How quickly can tsunamis be predicted using earthquake data?

The time it takes to predict a tsunami using earthquake data can vary, but it can be as quick as a few minutes to several hours. This depends on the location and magnitude of the earthquake, as well as the availability and accuracy of the data.

4. Can earthquakes be accurately predicted to prevent tsunamis?

Unfortunately, earthquakes cannot be accurately predicted to prevent tsunamis. While scientists can use earthquake data to forecast the likelihood of a tsunami, they are unable to predict exactly when and where an earthquake will occur.

5. What other factors besides earthquake data are considered when predicting tsunamis?

In addition to earthquake data, scientists also consider the topography and bathymetry (shape and depth) of the ocean floor, as well as historical data on past tsunamis in the area. They also use computer models to simulate and predict the potential impact of a tsunami.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
590
Replies
3
Views
660
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
840
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
11
Views
952
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
360
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top