- #1

- 22

- 0

I have learn multivariable calculus and ODE, but are there something need to learn before PDE?

Thanks in advance.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter pyfgcr
- Start date

- #1

- 22

- 0

I have learn multivariable calculus and ODE, but are there something need to learn before PDE?

Thanks in advance.

- #2

jedishrfu

Mentor

- 12,743

- 6,616

- #3

- 22

- 0

I wonder where I can learn all this stuff.

- #4

jedishrfu

Mentor

- 12,743

- 6,616

- #5

MathematicalPhysicist

Gold Member

- 4,443

- 266

The more advanced you get in the book the more you need to know more results from Analysis. It's up to you if you want to understand the methods to understand the theory behind them. It's a long road, that's for sure...

- #6

- 35

- 0

What was your interest when studying ODEs?

- #7

- 483

- 2

and try to solve it numerically.

Yes, numerical attempt will be like designing an experiment and you will learn a lot along the way.

Once you solve it numerically, in order to make sure you did correctly, try to get an analytical 1D solution with no y-variation and see if you solved it correctly.

Thing is, I had been educated for more than 10 years in different schools, in different contexts, but when I had to solve a PDE correctly,

that's when I learned all that is necessary. My 2 cents. Good luck.

- #8

- 35

- 0

People, especially pure math orientated have to understand that Des (ODE, PDE, DDE,…) are more than just objects to study from a mathematical point of view. Unfortunately, until now most math courses about Des are about theoretical properties. No doubt, this is important, but these guys (most of them are really not able to this) have to show students what one could do with these Des.

I am talking to you as a math PhD.

To start with Des either from a numerical point of view or a modeling point of view, it is much more important in order to understand the power of this tool than just concentrating on mathematical properties.

To understand why the solution of an ODE exists and is unique is important for the examination but it has nothing to do with the real value of an ODE.

As an example, I know money exists and it is important to have, but what you could do with it is a complete different field. The same with Des….

- #9

- 806

- 23

People, especially pure math orientated have to understand that Des (ODE, PDE, DDE,…) are more than just objects to study from a mathematical point of view. Unfortunately, until now most math courses about Des are about theoretical properties. No doubt, this is important, but these guys (most of them are really not able to this) have to show students what one could do with these Des.

I am talking to you as a math PhD.

To start with Des either from a numerical point of view or a modeling point of view, it is much more important in order to understand the power of this tool than just concentrating on mathematical properties.

To understand why the solution of an ODE exists and is unique is important for the examination but it has nothing to do with the real value of an ODE.

As an example, I know money exists and it is important to have, but what you could do with it is a complete different field. The same with Des….

Eh, in my experience most courses/texts devote so much time to numerical methods and applications that student's walk away without understanding how to solve

- #10

- 35

- 0

Nevertheless, I want to say that I am an expert in ODE modeling with biological background and we have to go back to the basics.

The traditional ideas of DES are what?

- #11

- 35

- 0

EDIT:

DEs are the perfect example where theoretical math fails (for students and most users, dont get me wrong theoretical stuff

is important but should not be only thing)

The question is not why my car is red and has 4 wheels (and not 7 maybe), the question is why I could drive from A to B with this (maybe perfect) car under several circumstances!

DEs are the perfect example where theoretical math fails (for students and most users, dont get me wrong theoretical stuff

is important but should not be only thing)

The question is not why my car is red and has 4 wheels (and not 7 maybe), the question is why I could drive from A to B with this (maybe perfect) car under several circumstances!

Last edited:

Share: