Why is the President of the USA celebrated like a hero?

  • News
  • Thread starter EL
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Usa
In summary, the conversation discusses the way Americans celebrate their president, with a lot of cheering and enthusiasm, similar to sports stars or heroes. However, the speaker finds this surreal and wonders if they have the wrong impression. They also mention that before rallies, people are screened and sometimes have to sign a loyalty oath to support the president. Some people in America also dislike the president, but those who attend rallies are supporters. The conversation also touches on the differences between American and Swedish politics and the hype surrounding political events in the US. The topic of regional accents and pronunciations is also briefly mentioned. Overall, the conversation highlights the cultural differences in the way people support and view their political leaders.
  • #1
EL
Science Advisor
558
0
How come americans celebrate their president in the way they do?
At least that's the impression one gets here in Europe.
Before every public speach he makes, there is always a lot cheering, "Yeah!", "Wow!", and so on, like he was a sports star or a hero or something...
To me this seems very surreal.
Or have I got the wrong impression?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you don't see is the people holding up signs behind the camera's with "APPLAUSE" written on them, oh and there's something having to sign a contract before going into those things but whatever.
 
  • #3
Many people in America hate the president... the people who go to his rallys and such are people who support him. I on the other hand take pleasure in knocking down bush/cheny signs (or did)... i noticed that when I went over to england. I also was surprised to find out that not everyone supports Blair over there. Over here its about 50/50 of those who support bush and those who don't.
 
  • #4
EL said:
How come americans celebrate their president in the way they do?
At least that's the impression one gets here in Europe.
Before every public speach he makes, there is always a lot cheering, "Yeah!", "Wow!", and so on, like he was a sports star or a hero or something...
To me this seems very surreal.
Or have I got the wrong impression?
You have the wrong impression.

51% of the voting population voted for Mr. Bush (assuming no cheating was involved)

Only 59% of the US population voted this time around.

So just about 30% of the US wanted 4 more years.

But about the ravenous crowds, in order to get into some Bush rallys, you have to go through a screening process, in which (in some cases) you have to sign a loath of loyalty swearing to vote for him (before Nov. 2 obviously). They pretty much don't allow anyone who doesn't support bush 150% into see him, since he can't handle dissent at all.
 
  • #5
Indeed. They won't let people who won't cheer in. Those bastards! Anyway, any man who pronounces "Nuclear", "Nukular" doesn't deserve to speak.
 
  • #6
EL said:
Or have I got the wrong impression?
Well the election was recently - so for the past 6 months, most of his public appearances were rallys. Those kinds of gatherings are specifically orchestrated to be like pep rallys, cheering your team on to victory. Most non-election oriented public appearances aren't that way.
 
  • #7
Just to clearify what I wrote:
I was talking about the U.S president in general. Not Bush in specific.

As I said the cheering looks very surreal to me.
If someone of the Swedish politicians would bring "cheerleaders" to their speaches before an election, people would laugh there asses out!
It's so non-real!
In fact I can't imagine how anyone could vote for any person coming up with such silly profounds. However you do not have much of a choice over there? I guess the democrats are as bad as the republicans in that sence...
 
Last edited:
  • #8
EL said:
Just to clearify what I wrote:
I was talking about the U.S president in general. Not Bush in specific.

As I said the cheering looks very surreal to me.
If someone of the Swedish politicians would bring "cheerleaders" to their speaches before an election, people would laugh there asses out!
It's so non-real!
In fact I can't imagine how anyone could vote for any person coming up with such silly profounds. However you do not have much of a choice over there? I guess the democrats are as bad as the republicans in that sence...
As you've probabally deduced, America seems to be MUCH different from Sweeden.

We like to fancy our leaders as surreal, larger than life blah blah blah.

I don't know if I'd call Democrats as bad as Republicans in fabricating cheering crowds and dismissing dissent. I've heard/seen plenty of Kerry rallys with people shouting "4 More Years", lots of Democratic candidates came up with lots of real good off-the-cuff ways of dealing with Republicans. I remember specifically one Howard Dean rally (a man who ran against Kerry for the Democratic nomination) a Bush supporter started yelling some crap, and Howard Dean just answered all the accusations and put him in his place embarrasingly.

I'll always remember one rally that Teresa Heniz Kerry was speaking at. Some Bush people were in the crowds chanting "4 More Years!", and very naturally she said "They want 4 more years of hell!". God, I loved that woman...
 
Last edited:
  • #9
As you've probabally deduced, America seems to be MUCH different from Sweeden.

We like to fancy our leaders as surreal, larger than life blah blah blah.

Around here they are just common folk ... but the hype that is gathered and put up for whatever occation & event in the US ... surreal.

I'll always remember one rally that Teresa Heniz Kerry was speaking at. Some Bush people were in the crowds chanting "4 More Years!", and very naturally she said "They want 4 more years of hell!". God, I loved that woman...

Well you can tell that she ain't native (and this time in a good way :smile: ).
 
  • #10
Odd! :smile:

EL: Have u ever seen a rally in South Africa or most African countries for that matter? People here absolutely adore their president or leader of their political party with the same amount of enthusiasm that English soccer fans have for their teams!

There's all the cheering as well as dancing and singing and chanting and everything else that goes with a celebratory mood!

Oh well! :smile:
 
  • #11
Zeteg said:
Indeed. They won't let people who won't cheer in. Those bastards! Anyway, any man who pronounces "Nuclear", "Nukular" doesn't deserve to speak.

Are you biased against any person speaking with a regional drawl? Many words in the English language, or any language, are pronounced differently depending on where you live.
 
  • #12
PerennialII said:
Around here they are just common folk ... but the hype that is gathered and put up for whatever occation & event in the US ... surreal.

Everything is bigger in Texas, my friend.
 
  • #13
Shahil said:
Odd! :smile:

EL: Have u ever seen a rally in South Africa or most African countries for that matter? People here absolutely adore their president or leader of their political party with the same amount of enthusiasm that English soccer fans have for their teams!

There's all the cheering as well as dancing and singing and chanting and everything else that goes with a celebratory mood!

Oh well! :smile:

No, I havn't seen it, but that is something I can understand due to the history of South Africa. In time I'm sure it will fade away.
 
  • #14
wasteofo2 said:
As you've probabally deduced, America seems to be MUCH different from Sweeden.

In fact, it's not that much of a difference in every day life. As from what I have seen you writing earlier I think you would like living in Sweden.
But one major difference is how the politics works:
Usually we don't vote for a party because of the charisma of the leader, we are more goverened by the basic ideology.
Therefore we see it in the way that it's really not the persons we have elected, they are just there to carry out what the people wants. We use to almost "look down" on the ministers, keeping them under sight, so that they will do a good job. (Some years ago a Swedish minister had to resign because she bought a Toblerone for a couple of dollars with a government pay card.)It's even very common to critizise the politicians you have voted for yourself. AND no one would blame you for being a treater just for critizising the government.
 
  • #15
Usually we don't vote for a party because of the charisma of the leader, we are more goverened by the basic ideology.
Therefore we see it in the way that it's really not the persons we have elected, they are just there to carry out what the people wants. We use to almost "look down" on the ministers, keeping them under sight, so that they will do a good job. (Some years ago a Swedish minister had to resign because she bought a Toblerone for a couple of dollars with a government pay card.)It's even very common to critizise the politicians you have voted for yourself. AND no one would blame you for being a treater just for critizising the government.

Yeah, in many parts of Europe it's been considered a real downturn of politics that it has started to focus as much as it has on persons, rather than ideologies, agendas etc. Politicians are seen as guys doing their job, not mythic heroes or in any way different from the average joe. It has its good and bad sides, I'd put focusing deeply on issues on the good side and the whole thing getting kind of official and boring on the bad side (if you care about such things).
 
  • #16
EL said:
(Some years ago a Swedish minister had to resign because she bought a Toblerone for a couple of dollars with a government pay card.).
If only that would happen in Canada!
 
  • #17
EL: I don't think that the passion for politics as such will die down. Especially in 3rd world countries, politics is REALLY an important part of life. People do see political figures as gods. Probably in 1st world situations where people are so busy caught up in their own lives - so much so that they don't even bother voting - is politics not that big an issue. Take a look at voter turnnouts as well - in 3rd world countries, turnout figures are astronomical with most of the eligible people voting.
 
  • #18
PerennialII said:
Politicians are seen as guys doing their job, not mythic heroes or in any way different from the average joe. It has its good and bad sides, I'd put focusing deeply on issues on the good side and the whole thing getting kind of official and boring on the bad side (if you care about such things).

Yeah, I agree there's a problem with politics getting boring. However I personally prefer it a little boring instead of having Austrian moviestars, or rich -have lost grip of reality a long time ago- patriotic men in charge.

What's strange is that in "boring" Sweden the election participation is higher than in the "entertaining" USA...
 
  • #19
Shahil said:
EL: I don't think that the passion for politics as such will die down.

Believe me, when the standard is raising, it will.

Especially in 3rd world countries, politics is REALLY an important part of life. People do see political figures as gods. Probably in 1st world situations where people are so busy caught up in their own lives - so much so that they don't even bother voting - is politics not that big an issue. Take a look at voter turnnouts as well - in 3rd world countries, turnout figures are astronomical with most of the eligible people voting.

I totally agree.
 
  • #20
EL said:
What's strange is that in "boring" Sweden the election participation is higher than in the "entertaining" USA...
I think a large portion of the USA has just given up on the system either because they don't like either candidate or because they think the system is rigged or just because they realize it's the social elite who control the country anyways.
 
  • #21
Yeah, I agree there's a problem with politics getting boring. However I personally prefer it a little boring instead of having Austrian moviestars, or rich -have lost grip of reality a long time ago- patriotic men in charge.

What's strange is that in "boring" Sweden the election participation is higher than in the "entertaining" USA...

I think a large portion of the USA has just given up on the system either because they don't like either candidate or because they think the system is rigged or just because they realize it's the social elite who control the country anyways.

So in the US its considered that with politics you can't really affect anything, in Europe (at least its northern part) the feeling is that irrespective of what we do pretty much same things are going to happen anyway ... the "officials" will do what they do and feel is necessary pretty much no matter who is running the show. Go figure which one is better, actually they resemble each other quite a bit in the end although the constructs differ (and I'd still take the subject focused any day).
 

1. Is the President of the USA considered a hero?

The perception of the President of the USA as a hero is subjective and varies among individuals. Some may view the president as a hero for their leadership and accomplishments, while others may not see them in the same light. Ultimately, it depends on one's personal beliefs and values.

2. What qualities make a President of the USA a hero?

There is no definitive list of qualities that make a President of the USA a hero. Some may consider qualities such as courage, intelligence, and empathy to be important, while others may prioritize different traits. Additionally, one's definition of a hero may differ from another's, making it difficult to pinpoint specific qualities.

3. Are all US Presidents automatically considered heroes?

No, not all US Presidents are automatically considered heroes. Each president's actions, decisions, and impact during their time in office can influence how they are perceived by the public. Some are remembered as heroes, while others are not viewed in the same light.

4. Can the President of the USA be considered a hero even if they made mistakes or controversial decisions?

Again, this is subjective and depends on one's personal beliefs and values. Some may view a President of the USA as a hero despite their mistakes or controversial decisions, while others may not. It ultimately comes down to individual interpretation and perspective.

5. How does the media influence the perception of the President of the USA as a hero?

The media can play a significant role in shaping the public's perception of the President of the USA as a hero. Positive or negative coverage can influence how the president is viewed by the public. It is important to critically evaluate information from various sources and not rely solely on media portrayal when forming an opinion on the president's heroism.

Similar threads

  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
892
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
920
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
80
Views
10K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top