Presidential Candidates 2008

  • News
  • Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date
  • #76
turbo
Gold Member
3,077
45
That's been evident to the GOP for some time. They keep portraying Clinton as the inevitable Democratic nominee because that's who they want to face. They have all the sincerity of Bre'r Rabbit pleading not to get thrown into the brier patch.
 
  • #77
WheelsRCool
I would prefer Fred Thompson, but I don't think he has a chance of getting the nomination, or of beating Hillary if he did. I have a feeling that the Republican nomination will go to Giuliani. I like certain of his stances, but he is too much of a gun-grabber IMO.

Abortion I agree with him on, in that I don't like it, but I think it should ultimately be the woman's right to choose.

BTW, the Republican debate is tomorrow at 8 PM I believe on CNN for those who want to watch.
 
  • #78
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
80
It's probably time to start making outrageous predictions.

I'm predicting Huckabee to defeat Clinton in November.

I don't have any idea how Huckabee's going to compete if has no money, even if he makes a strong showing in Iowa (which looks likely). Still, a choice between Giuliani, McCain, Romney, and Thompson is leaving the GOP split and it's certainly possible for Huckabee to step right in if he somehow comes up with campaign money.

In a battle between Huckabee and Clinton, Clinton doesn't stand a chance. Huckabee's just too likeable, while Clinton's just too unlikeable. (Kind of ironic that Giuliani and Romney are both hoping Clinton's the Democratic nominee - she could beat both of them).

Even with Clinton's sudden supposed vulnerability, her campaign is just run too well for any of the other Democrats to really threaten her.

As to my own personal choice, that's probably kind of ironic, as well. I'd prefer McCain or Giuliani to Huckabee, but both would lose to Clinton. But, with a choice between Huckabee and Clinton, I might vote for Clinton.
Huckabee winning isn't looking quite so outrageous now. Surging to 2-1 lead over Romney (39% - 17%) in Iowa is shocking only because of the margin. The bigger news is that he's up to second in the national polls (Polling Report).

Win or lose the nomination, I think it's to the point that Huckabee sinks any chance Romney had of turning some early victories into momentum for the big primaries. Thompson had his moment and didn't have anything to say so he's going to slide on into oblivion. It's down to Huckabee, Giuliani, and McCain.

Obama looks like he might do well enough in Iowa to at least make it look like there's a Democratic race, but I still just don't see him really threatening the Clinton machine.
 
  • #79
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,824
2,050
For those interested -

The Democratic presidential candidates on the stump
http://wordforword.publicradio.org/programs/2007/12/21/

Joe Biden in Portsmouth N.H. (11/27/07)
Hillary Clinton in Cedar Rapids Iowa (11/05/07)
Chris Dodd in Iowa City, Iowa (11/06/07)
John Edwards in Portsmouth, N.H. (10/30/07)
Mike Gravel in Bedford, N.H. (06/09/07)
Dennis Kucinich in Concord N.H. (11/27/07)
Barack Obama in Manchester, N.H. (12/09/07)
Bill Richardson at the Iowa State Fair (8/14/07)


The Republican presidential candidates on the stump
http://wordforword.publicradio.org/programs/2007/12/14/

Rudy Giuliani in Manchester, N.H. (11/5/07)
Mike Huckabee in Concord, N.H. (11/30/07)
John McCain in Concord, N.H. (7/13/07)
Ron Paul in Manchester, N.H. (9/29/07)
Mitt Romney at the Iowa State Fair (8/10/07)
Tom Tancredo in Somersworth, N.H. (3/10/07)
Fred Thompson at the Iowa State Fair (8/17/07)
 
  • #80
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,824
2,050
Change?

Stirred, Not Shaken - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/opinion/06kinsley.html

By MICHAEL KINSLEY, Seattle
IF it’s a question of “experience” versus “change,” change will win every time. Hillary Clinton, of all people, should have known that. Doesn’t she remember 1992? That was when her husband made “change” his mantra and chanted it all the way to the White House. This year, Mrs. Clinton tried to suggest that Barack Obama does not have enough experience to be president. He hung her experience around her neck and chanted the change mantra himself.

An Obama presidency would, in fact, be a huge change in all sorts of obvious ways. Yet on the Republican side as well, there is talk of change. Of course it is trickier with a sitting Republican president. But that hasn’t stopped one of the candidates from seizing on the word and using it as the centerpiece of his campaign.

It’s not the candidate you would have guessed if you haven’t been listening to them: it’s Mitt Romney. Nothing better illustrates the mystical power of “change” in American politics, and its malleability, than its selection by the expensively engineered Romney machine, even though the word doesn’t seem to apply in any way to the man or his campaign.

It’s hard to say what Mr. Romney’s campaign is really about. He would clearly do or say anything or its opposite to become president. But, in general, he seems to be trying to make himself as conventional a Republican as possible, calling for tax cuts blah blah blah, supporting President Bush 100 percent on Iraq, shedding any aberrant views on abortion or gay rights that he may have picked up by accident in Massachusetts.

. . . .
So what "Change" do Americans want?

What "Change" does each candidate represent?

Or do we get status quo - "the more things change, the more they stay the same"?
 
  • #81
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,213
176
If Hillary is elected in November, that would mean that two US presidents had sex together.:yuck: Now that's a first. This hubby/wife thing didn't seem all that strange until I thought about it that way!
 
  • #82
960
0
Ivam,

Now how do we lnow this is a first?
 
  • #83
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,213
176
Well, everyone including ex-presidents have been screwed by Bush! :uhh:
 

Related Threads on Presidential Candidates 2008

  • Poll
  • Last Post
50
Replies
1K
Views
87K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
54
Replies
1K
Views
151K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
118
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
153
Views
15K
Top