Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Presidential election 2008

  1. Obama by over 15 Electoral Votes

    16 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Obama by under 15 Electoral Votes

    6 vote(s)
    18.8%
  3. McCain by over 15 Electoral Votes

    4 vote(s)
    12.5%
  4. McCain by under 15 Electoral Votes

    6 vote(s)
    18.8%
  1. Jun 5, 2008 #1

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Ok, we have Obama and McCain. I've been hearing about Hispanic votes and New Mexico as a key State for Obama to win with Hispanics. Uhm, New Mexico only carries 5 electoral votes. Also, has anyone looked at the numbers of eligible black and Hispanic voters?

    They're negligible.

    Total eligible Hispanic voters in the US 17,315,000

    Total eligible Black voters in the US 24,115,000

    Total eligible White Voters in the US 151,110,000

    52% of white eligible voters are women

    48% of white eligible voters are men

    http://pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/34.pdf

    I want to throw out the numbers and see what everyone thinks will be key to a victory for Obama or McCain.

    Electoral votes by state.

    http://www.fec.gov/pages/elecvote.htm

    Another good website for reference as we head to November is

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/throw_out_the_maps_in_2008.html

    Lots of good statistics. All of the best polls shown and most up to date. Not biased.

    I'd like to see this thread as a reflection of what is happening in the following months and as a way to help us all make informed choices. So much happens, many of us simply cannot take the time we'd like to stay on top of everything and wade through the "mud" that will no doubt be slung. Feel free to post political speeches, articles and things of interest.

    You are welcome to add your views, but please NO TRASH TALK. I WILL delete posts that are just venemous spewings or that have no merit.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 5, 2008 #2

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    More polling data, giving electoral vote predictions:

    1. RCP Electoral College Map

    Currently: Obama = 228, McCain = 190, Toss ups = 120 EVs


    2. Electoral-vote.com

    Currently: Obama = 287, McCain = 227, Ties = 24


    3. Election Projection

    Currently: Obama = 293, McCain = 245

    To see the individual polls that go into the composite in all of the above, click within any state on the map.
     
  4. Jun 5, 2008 #3
    The numbers for blacks will very likely go up and are probably already higher than when that data was gathered. Unfortunately blacks and latinos don't necessarily get along well. Unless Obama has a hispanic running mate or he starts taking on immigration policy (which would likely be a shot in the foot) I don't see him rallying the hispanic vote in any significant way.
     
  5. Jun 5, 2008 #4

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    But would it be worth it for Obama to take on a VP just for the Hispanic vote? How much would it gain him overall?
     
  6. Jun 5, 2008 #5

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Thanks Gokul!

    Poll added for Gokul.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  7. Jun 6, 2008 #6
    I don't think it would really help. More than likely the rabid anti-illegal alien people will see a hispanic in the white house as a sure sign of impending open border policies and turn out in force to vote "against" Obama. It would possibly be even worse than if he had Hillary on the ticket with him. But it's one of the only ways I can see him rallying hispanics. I think he'll just have to settle for making them comfortable and not pissing them off. Maybe workers' rights would be a good platform?
     
  8. Jun 6, 2008 #7

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  9. Jun 6, 2008 #8

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Don't know how reliable this is, but these articles have some maps and data on the primaries & caucuses.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2008

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
    Includes discussion of popular vote with various ways to compute it.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2008

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries


    I think the VP candidates will be fairly, perhaps strong, influence on the election.
     
  10. Jun 6, 2008 #9

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

  11. Jun 6, 2008 #10

    cristo

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I don't really know enough about the electoral college, or even how the US elections work, but I think it'll make a difference who Obama chooses as his VP won't it?
     
  12. Jun 6, 2008 #11

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Each state is assigned a certain number of electors to the Electoral College, based on representation in Congress (House + Senate).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Electoral_College
    So a VP may affect the popular vote in any one state.

    CA (55), TX (34), NY (31), FL (27) are the Big 4, followed by PA & IL (each 21), OH (20), MI (17), NC (15), . . . .
     
  13. Jun 6, 2008 #12
    I'll wait until November to vote. In my opinion, McCain's chances of winning are about 000000000000000.6
     
  14. Jun 6, 2008 #13

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes Obama's VP will be critical, not so much for McCain.
     
  15. Jun 6, 2008 #14

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    That's too narrow a reason to pick a VP, but added to Bill Richardson's diplomatic credentials, his experience as secretary of energy, his record of bipartisan cooperation, and his popularity amongst governors, he would be a VERY good choice. He might pull some Hispanic votes that might otherwise have gone to McCain, but his heritage alone should not be the deciding factor. The guy is smart and experienced and would bring a lot to the table. He's no flashy extemporaneous speaker like Obama, but that's not a negative in my book because Obama has that covered and Richardson would add age and experience to the ticket. The fact that Richardson has negotiated the release of captured soldiers and political prisoners held by some of the very nations that Bush refuses to talk to would put some teeth in Obama's claim that he wants to beef up US diplomacy and pursue diplomatic channels to resolve problems instead of rattling swords and applying sanctions as first options, as the Bush administration tends to do.
     
  16. Jun 6, 2008 #15

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think McCain's choice will be equally as critical. Not to be morbid, but his age is a factor. From the Social Security actuarial tables, for men:


    Age Chance of Chance of
    Dying in 1 year not dying

    72 0.033 0.967
    73 0.036 0.964
    74 0.040 0.960
    75 0.043 0.957

    Chance of not dying in 4 years = (0.967)(0.964)(0.960)(0.957) = 0.856

    Chance of a 72 year old man dying within 4 years = 14.4%

    (I included the math because it's been a while since I've taken statistics - please check for accuracy.)

    http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/STATS/table4c6.html

    Of course, SS stats are based on the larger population, and include the infirm. He's a tough guy, no doubt about that, and his chances are likely better than what's calculated here.
     
  17. Jun 6, 2008 #16

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Good point.
     
  18. Jun 6, 2008 #17

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member


    DOH! Sorry, my post got sort of garbled! It looked fine in the edit window...

    First column: age
    Second column: chance of dying in one year
    Third column: chance of not dying in one year
     
  19. Jun 6, 2008 #18

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I don't wish to be morbid, either, but both presidential candidates need to pick someone who can slide right into the top spot if needed. There are white-supremacist groups loaded with people who will bear an irrational hatred against Obama just because of his skin color, and that's got be giving his SS detail fits. Obama would be the ripest target since Lincoln.
     
  20. Jun 6, 2008 #19

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I agree. There is still enough of a racist undercurrent in this country that this is a valid concern. This is going to be an election where the VPs really are going to be a factor in the voting decisions.

    Obama doesn't need to worry so much about the Hispanic vote in this election as he does the blue collar labor groups as a whole. He's ticked off a lot of them during his campaign, and those votes are ones he needs to win the swing states. While the media plays that off as a "white" population, I think that's an error too. The person working for housekeeping down at the Motel 6 can have any color skin and they're going to have trouble relating to someone who is worried about the price of arugula at the Whole Foods store. They're worried about the price of ordinary bread and milk at the Safeway.

    I think Obama may run into the same problems Kerry ran into with those populations, and some of it may have nothing to do with his positions on issues, but just how he comes across in demeanor. He has that tall, thin, good posture, aristocratic look that will leave the working class distrusting him. McCain has more of the soft, rounded, jovial, let's listen to Grandpa talk about his war stories look.

    I do think it's going to be a close election again, mainly because neither of them really inspires great confidence in a large enough segment of the population to stand ahead as a clear leader.
     
  21. Jun 6, 2008 #20

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The way I see it, close elections (assuming this will be one) are won on the margins. A few tens of thousands of votes gained or lost in key places is what swings them from one to the other.

    Hispanic votes are key in a key state (Florida), so yes, they are important.

    This is also why I see Obama's race as an electability problem. The democrats are virtually guaranteed 90+% of the black vote, regardless of who they put up for office, so there isn't much benefit to appealing to black votors unless they can increase black votor turnout. But if his race is a problem for some (and Hillary was right - lower class whites liked her a lot better than him), the democrats stand to lose a lot of votes in their core constituency.

    This is also why a half-decent or better black republican would be virtually guaranteed a landslide victory against a white democrat.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Presidential election 2008
Loading...