Consider a sequence of Bernoulli trials where we play until the rth success is attained. Denote [itex]\Omega[/itex] the fundamental set.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

We define a function P on [itex]\Omega[/itex] by saying say that an elementary event that is a k-tuple has a probability of occurence of

[tex]q^{k-r}p^r[/tex]

because the trials are independant and the probability of success at each of them is p and the probability of failure is q.

Now I ask wheter or not with these probabilities assigned to each elementary event, we do have [itex]P(\Omega)=1[/itex]? Did I miss something and it is implied that [itex]P(\Omega)=1[/itex], or we have to show that

[tex]\sum_{k=r}^{\infty}\binom{k-1}{r-1}q^{k-r}p^r=1[/tex]

to show that P defined above is indeed a probability on [itex]\Omega[/itex]?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Probability - Bernoulli stuff

Loading...

Similar Threads for Probability Bernoulli stuff | Date |
---|---|

A Sample Test |Component Life Time | Monday at 5:06 AM |

A Simulation from a process given by "complicated" SDE | Friday at 9:48 AM |

I Probability function for discrete functions | Apr 11, 2018 |

I Combinatorics & probability density | Apr 6, 2018 |

Expected value of bernoulli random variable. | Dec 9, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**