Yes I live in Christchurch under the bit that hasn't been broken. But check the map and you can see that our story could be one of a large lateral fault in the middle of its creation. At first I could believe this was unlikely (having good access to local scientists who know the geology). The story was the original quake was an existing mag 7 faultine buried under some 20k years of alluvial gravel. But recently it has become suggested it was instead four lesser cracks becoming lined up. And now we have had a 6.3 very shallow fault that looks like an extension of the previous line of stress. And in turn, that there is a further big chunk of potential fault inbetween now waiting to go. A line that in fact runs through my house along with the rest of the unbroken part of town. So any experts out there want to look at the maps and hazard some opinions? It is already accepted here that smaller lateral faults to the Alpine fault are assembling into larger ones all down the east coast of New Zealand. There are a bunch of about seven (including the Hope, Awatere, etc) running from Wellington down to Kaikoura, and one known to be assembling at the southern end. Christchurch would now be the same happening even further south. And perhaps wanting to complete the job in six months, six years, who knows? Check this geonet map to see early view of where the Christchurch faults lie. http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/recent_quakes.html Here is the story on the laterals further north. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlborough_Fault_System And then this comment from our top earthquake guru, Kelvin Berryman, just yesterday about the new questions.