1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Probably simple proof (Stoke's Theorem)

  1. Sep 23, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Prove that ∫u∇v dl = - ∫v∇u dl

    Both integrals are over closed surfaces.

    2. Relevant equations

    The question is being asked in a chapter over Stoke's Theorem. However, I'm confused because I think found the solution without invoking the theorem... Which leads to...

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I used integration by parts to derive

    ∫u∇v dl = uv - ∫v∇u dl

    However since it's over a closed surface, I believe (uv) goes to zero. Is this the correct proof? Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Probably simple proof (Stoke's Theorem)
  1. Proving stokes theorem (Replies: 2)

Loading...