1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Probing series solution of DE: irregular singular point

  1. Mar 11, 2012 #1


    User Avatar

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Suppose we try find a solution of the form<br />
    Show that if r=2 and s=1 then there is only one possible value of [itex]\lambda[/itex] for which there is a formal solution in the form shown above.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    Substituting the general solution into the DE gives us:

    [itex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+ \lambda )(n+ \lambda -1)a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda -2}+\frac{\alpha}{x^{2}}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+ \lambda )a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda -1}+\frac{\beta}{x}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda }=0[/itex]

    [itex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+\lambda)(n+\lambda-1)a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda -2}+\alpha \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+ \lambda )a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda -3}+\beta \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n+ \lambda -1}=0[/itex]

    Pulling out some terms to make the starting terms in the summation have the same order of x:
    [itex]\lambda(\lambda-1)a_{0}x^{\lambda-2}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(n+\lambda)(n+\lambda-1)a_{n}x^{n+\lambda-2}+\alpha \lambda a_{0}x^{\lambda-3}+\alpha(1+\lambda)a_{1}x^{\lambda-2 }+\alpha \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}(n+\lambda)a_{n}x^{n+\lambda-3}+\beta \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n+\lambda-1}=0[/itex]

    Short of shifting the summations and doing some grouping(I don't feel like that is necessary to complete the answer to the question), at this point I'm not sure what I should do. Do I look at the coefficients of the lowest power of x as I would do if there was a quadratic indical equation? If that were the case I would simply say[itex]\alpha \lambda a_{0}=0[/itex] therefore the only possible value for [itex]\lambda[/itex] is zero(since alpha and [itex]a_{0}[/itex] are arbitrary). But then what does that mean for all the other co-efficients? Why would I be interested in that term anyway, since it is not actually an indical equation? I'm pretty sure that the solution lies in TRYING to get a quadratic indical equation and consequently failing

    I feel like I'm not far from deducing the answer, but I'm uneasy since I think I'm essentially dealing with a question that is telling me to 'show that the Frobenius method won't work for an irregular singular point'. I have no rules for trying to do this.

    Note: There is a similar question in Boyce & DiPrima Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems(2nd edition)
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted