Solving Relativity Paradox & Problems in Physics

  • Thread starter Juxt
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Paradox
In summary: This is the basis of Einstein's theory of relativity. When an object moves at a high speed, its perception of time changes as well. Therefore, as an object approaches the speed of light, time for that object slows down. This is known as time dilation.Now, back to the original question. Can two spaceships traveling in opposite directions go .99c? The answer is no, because as one spaceship approaches the speed of light, its perception of time slows down. In order for the other spaceship to also reach .99c, it would have to surpass the speed of light, which is impossible according to Einstein's
  • #1
Juxt
8
0
To start off, I am in my second year of high school physics so please be discriptive if you make reference to any sort of theory. We have begun to study relativity, and two things occurred to me.

First, assuming that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, could two spaceships traveling in opposite directions go .99c? It would seem to me that since the frame of reference is moving at a speed of .99c, the spaceship moving opposite it would be traveling at a speed of 1.98c. Is this possible?

Second, it is basic knowledge that the inside of a wheel will spin slower than the outside of a wheel. What happens if the inside of the wheel is spinning at the speed of light? The outside of the wheel must then be moving at a speed that is greater than c or the wheel is tearing itself to pieces.

Any ideas on what happens in either scenario would be insightful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First, assuming that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, could two spaceships traveling in opposite directions go .99c? It would seem to me that since the frame of reference is moving at a speed of .99c, the spaceship moving opposite it would be traveling at a speed of 1.98c. Is this possible?
If you are going to talk about relativity, use relativity. In the theory of relativity, the speed of two objects, moving toward each other with speeds of u and v (relative to the same object), relative to one another, is (u+v)/(1+ uv/c2). In the example you give, two spaceships, moving toward one another with speed .99c relative to a planet between them, have speed relative to one another of (.99c+ .99c)/(1+ (.99)(.99))= 1.98c/1.9801= 0.999949c. Awfully close to c but not equal or larger than c.

Second, it is basic knowledge that the inside of a wheel will spin slower than the outside of a wheel. What happens if the inside of the wheel is spinning at the speed of light? The outside of the wheel must then be moving at a speed that is greater than c or the wheel is tearing itself to pieces.
How do you get the inside of the wheel moving "at the speed of light"? Any physical object must be moving at a speed below the speed of light which leaves plenty of room of portions of the wheel further out to be moving at higher speeds that are still lower than the speed of light.
 
  • #3
Okay, the wheel was a bad example of what I was thinking about.

Assuing that it is possible for the speed of light to be attained...

We have a square shaped spaceship moving at the speed of light.

A--B
||||
C--D

What will happen if the ship moves into a turn to follow a circular path long enough to reverse directions. Assume that the corner A will always maintain the speed of light. What will happen to the other corners of the ship? Since the ship is turning the corners B,C, and D must move faster to keep up with corner A throughout the turn. I'm not looking for mathematical proof of anything just theories on what would happen to the object if parts of it needed to exceed the speed of light.
 
  • #4
You must also remember that the mass is relative to an objects resting mass divided by the square root of (1 minus (v^2/c^2)).
Taking this in account you get that as an object gets closer to c, its mass will increase, and thus the spaceship won't really be able to travel by the speed of light - only a fraction of it.

//Martin (also in high school)
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Juxt
It would seem to me that since the frame of reference is moving at a speed of .99c, the spaceship moving opposite it would be traveling at a speed of 1.98c.
The coordinate systems of the two ships are skewed. From the frame of reference in which you have defined the motions of the ships, the world line and now line for a given ship are almost indistinguishable. This is the geometric version of the explanation. The algebraic version seems to have already been mentioned. Remember, there were other relativities before Einstein's. Don't get them confused. In Galilean, there is no special speed. In Einstein's, the invariance of the speed of light comes before you even try to think about space ships and laser beams.




Originally posted by Juxt
Second, it is basic knowledge that the inside of a wheel will spin slower than the outside of a wheel. What happens if the inside of the wheel is spinning at the speed of light? The outside of the wheel must then be moving at a speed that is greater than c or the wheel is tearing itself to pieces.
First, I will revise this to say that the tangential velocity of the surface of the axle is 0.99c. Then, assuming that the radius of the axle is much less than the raidus of the outside of the wheel, you certainly have a problem. Let's just say that you do in fact have the axle spinning as mentioned. Then the spokes will spiral outward, and the metallic bonding that holds the atoms of the spokes to each other will break.
 
  • #6
Originally posted by Juxt
To start off, I am in my second year of high school physics so please be discriptive if you make reference to any sort of theory. We have begun to study relativity, and two things occurred to me.

First, assuming that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, could two spaceships traveling in opposite directions go .99c? It would seem to me that since the frame of reference is moving at a speed of .99c, the spaceship moving opposite it would be traveling at a speed of 1.98c. Is this possible?


Any ideas on what happens in either scenario would be insightful.

For every movement forward a object of Mass will increase its mass. So the two spaceships traveling head-on will both be increasing their masses, therefore their approaching speeds relative to each other will actually de-crease as they both gain Mass, Assumming both have the same relative speeds.

Of course you have heard of the zeno Arrow paradox?..if you apply this analogy, then for every movement forward, you have to release your Mass in order to proceed, if you want to achieve a comparable speed to Light, then you have to in effect become Light, this is contained within the E=Mc2. Taking away some of your Mass for every movement forward, increase's your speed (which gives you more Mass!)so in the equation you have to 'shed' your mass, or contract your Mass to achieve Light Speed.

Light 'Boosting' occurs as you gradually loose mass to speed in a specific ratio, the problem is though at a precise moment you will become 'Tachyon', and will be infact a mirror-particle, coming towards your initial direction of motion. In non technical terms you will be a 'future' you, traveling from a future to a present-time,not the same as your initial scenario of both ships traveling from a Past>>Present-Tense.

The Tachyon scenario travels opposite from Future>>Present-Tense.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
ok. but what if the spaceships move in the opposite directions and their speeds relative to the plantet between them are 0.99c...?
 
  • #8
originally posted by FilipKunc
ok. but what if the spaceships move in the opposite directions and their speeds relative to the plantet between them are 0.99c...?

Didn't you read the first response to this question?:
If you are going to talk about relativity, use relativity. In the theory of relativity, the speed of two objects, moving toward each other with speeds of u and v (relative to the same object), relative to one another, is (u+v)/(1+ uv/c2). In the example you give, two spaceships, moving toward one another with speed .99c relative to a planet between them, have speed relative to one another of (.99c+ .99c)/(1+ (.99)(.99))= 1.98c/1.9801= 0.999949c. Awfully close to c but not equal or larger than c.
 

1. What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity is a scientific theory proposed by Albert Einstein in the early 20th century that explains the relationship between space and time. It has two main components: the special theory of relativity, which deals with objects moving at constant speeds, and the general theory of relativity, which takes into account the effects of gravity on the fabric of space-time.

2. What is a paradox in the context of relativity?

A paradox in the context of relativity refers to a situation or scenario that seems to contradict the predictions or principles of the theory. These paradoxes often arise due to the counterintuitive nature of the theory and can lead to further scientific inquiry and discovery.

3. How are relativity paradoxes solved?

Relativity paradoxes are typically solved by examining the assumptions and principles of the theory and identifying any logical inconsistencies or errors. Scientists may also use mathematical equations and experiments to test and verify the predictions of the theory and resolve the paradox.

4. What are some common relativity paradoxes?

Some common relativity paradoxes include the Twin Paradox, the Ehrenfest Paradox, and the Ladder Paradox. These paradoxes deal with topics such as time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence principle, and have been studied and resolved by scientists over the years.

5. Why is solving relativity paradoxes important in physics?

Solving relativity paradoxes is important in physics because it helps to refine and improve our understanding of the theory of relativity. By identifying and resolving these paradoxes, scientists can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental principles of space and time, and potentially uncover new insights and discoveries in the field of physics.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
889
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
242
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
21K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
629
Back
Top