Problem involving P-V diagram

  • #1
issacnewton
980
22
Hi

Here is a small problem. I already got the answer for part a. I have question about the part b.
For finding the heat energy input/output in each process from A to A, can't we use the
formula for the specific heat of the gas.

[tex] Q=m\, c \, (\Delta T) [/tex]


But if we use that , I get [itex] Q_{net} =0 [/itex] for the whole cycle.

That could not be correct, since I am getting net work done as

[tex]W_{net}=-4P_i V_i [/tex]

Since in a thermodynamic cycle, we must have

[tex] \Delta E_{int} = 0[/tex]

we deduce that

[tex]Q_{net}=-W_{net} = 4 P_i V_i [/tex]

So what's wrong with my beginning approach to Qnet ?
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    41.1 KB · Views: 398

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,134
161
Hi

Here is a small problem. I already got the answer for part a. I have question about the part b.
For finding the heat energy input/output in each process from A to A, can't we use the
formula for the specific heat of the gas.

[tex] Q=m\, c \, (\Delta T) [/tex]


But if we use that , I get [itex] Q_{net} =0 [/itex] for the whole cycle.
This is a good question! Without thinking through the details, I suspect the answer lies in the fact that for some paths cv is relevant, and for others cp is used. So adding up c???ΔT for the four paths doesn't result in zero, even if adding up the ΔT's results in zero.
 
  • #3
issacnewton
980
22
Hi Redbelly, yes , you are right. Gases would have different c values for constant volume and constant pressure.
 
  • #4
issacnewton
980
22
Redbelly

I got it right now. Here are different heats I got.

[tex] Q_{AB}=mc_v (2T_A) [/tex]

[tex]Q_{BC}=mc_p(6T_A)[/tex]

[tex]Q_{CD}=mc_v(-6T_A) [/tex]

[tex] Q_{DA}=mc_p(-2T_A) [/tex]

so we got

[tex] Q_{net}=4mT_A(c_p-c_v) [/tex]

But for the ideal gas, we have the relation between specific heats of the gas (with repect
to mass , not molar specific heats )

[tex]c_p-c_v = \frac{nR}{m} [/tex]

also at point A, we have

[tex] P_i V_i = nRT_A[/tex]

using these two relations we get

[tex] Q_{net}=4mT_A\left(\frac{nR}{m}\right)=4(nRT_A) = 4P_i V_i [/tex]

[tex] Q_{net} = - W [/tex]

which is what I got earlier. So it makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the hint
 

Suggested for: Problem involving P-V diagram

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
838
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
699
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
10K
Top