Problem with four vectors

  • Thread starter parton
  • Start date
  • #1
83
1
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

[tex] \dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex].

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: [tex] pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} [/tex] and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
251
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

[tex] \dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex].

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: [tex] pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} [/tex] and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
Hi parton! :smile:

If we're letting q --> 0, then we may as well put q = (a,0,0,0) and let a --> 0.

Then it's -ap0p2/(-ap0 ± √(a2p02 - a2p2)), = -p0p2/(-p0 ± √(p02 - p2)),

which I think is m2/(1 ± v).

But I expect the result is different if q --> 0 along some other path.
 
  • #3
54
0
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

[tex] \dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex].

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: [tex] pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} [/tex] and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
I would like to see a general solution to this as well. I poked at it but nothing immediately jumped out at me. The general solution must determine how [tex] -pq [/tex] compares to [tex]\sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex] as q-->0. It's not obvious to me that the latter approaches zero any order "faster" so the ratio [tex] \dfrac{- (pq) }{ \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex] must approach some constant, but does that constant depend on q's path?

I'm guessing there is either some nice identity that you can use if you expand it all out OR you may have to use some differentials to eventually end up with [tex] A p^{2}[/tex] where A is some constant.

Although, if the answer really is path independent, then choosing your favorite path might be the way to go like tiny-tim suggested!
 
  • #4
415
0
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

[tex] \dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} [/tex].

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: [tex] pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} [/tex] and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
I think you can do this without loss of generality by choosing a coordinate system where q = (a,0,0,0), like tiny-tim suggested. Then [tex](pq)^2 = (p_0a)^2[/tex], and [tex]p^2 q^2 = p^2 a^2[/tex], so then you have

[tex]\frac{ -p_0 a p^2}{-p_0a \pm \sqrt{a^2(p_0^2 - p^2)}}[/tex]

The a's can now be canceled out to give

[tex]\frac{ -p_0 p^2}{-p_0 \pm \sqrt{p_0^2 - p^2}}[/tex]

In another coordinate system, you would interpret [tex]p_0[/tex] as the component of p that points in the direction of q. I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have [tex]p^2 \ge p_0^2[/tex], so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.
 
  • #5
1,159
0
...I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have [tex]p^2 \ge p_0^2[/tex], so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.
Everything is OK: p2=m2 but p02>m2.
 

Related Threads on Problem with four vectors

  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
640
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
987
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
8K
Top