I mean if you define the n-th momentum of a probability distribution:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] <x^n > = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx P(x) x^n [/tex] (1)

then my question is about the function P(x) (probability distribution) :surprised :surprised when:

[tex] P(x)=e^{-af(x) } [/tex] where a is a constant (real or complex)

-if f(x) is f(x)=x^2 then you have a "Gaussian" for a>0 and you can obtain every moment using (1)

- if f(x) is any function and a>0 ,a-->oo (big) you can use "Saddle-point approximation".

-the question is how can you handle if P(x) is of the form:

[tex] P(x)=x^2 + \alpha g(x) [/tex] where "alpha" is an small coupling constant so you could expand [tex] exp(\alpha g(x) ) [/tex] and take only a few terms in that case i think you can take:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx P(x) = \sum_ n a(n) <x^n > [/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Problem with Probabilistic

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**