Process Physics

  • Thread starter dansas
  • Start date
  • #1
4
0
I have been unable to find this topic discussed in "search forums" [ If it has been, I am deeply sorry].

Is Process Physics useful? Is it mature enough to spend time studying and learning it? What is, so far, the general consensus in the community about its value?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Physics [Broken]
http://www.scieng.flinders.edu.au/cpes/people/cahill_r/processphysics.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,006
5
Never heard of it. The wikipedia article mentions Reg Cahill a few times in the opening, that can't be a good sign.

(The physics community responds that way to people who proclaim that the noise in their cheap motion-through-ether-measuring experiments is actually gravitational wave signals.)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
87
0
I've previously sat down and read through a 100+ page document on this. In my opinion it started with promise but then spiralled into misconception.

Note that that's just an opinion. I can offer no credentials to back it up, and I can't properly be considered to be part of the physics community.
 

Related Threads on Process Physics

Replies
1
Views
809
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
721
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
665
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
T
Replies
35
Views
7K
Top