Supposing we have a vector space [tex]V[/tex] and a subspace [tex]V_1\subset V[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Suppose further that we have two different direct sum decompositions of the total space [tex]V=V_1\oplus V_2[/tex] and [tex]V_1\oplus V_2'[/tex]. Given the linear projection operators [tex]P_1, P_2, P_1', P_2'[/tex] onto these decompositions, we have that [tex]P_2\circ P_1=P_2\circ P_1'=0[/tex]. But then we have that [tex]P_2(v)=P_2(P_1'+P_2')(v)=P_2 (P_2'(v))[/tex]. Now, for [tex]v\notin V_1[/tex], given any [tex]w\notin V_1[/tex], we can find a decomposition such that [tex]P_2'(v)=w[/tex].

This gives the apparently wrong result that for any [tex]v,w\notin V_1, ~P_2(v)=P_2(w)[/tex]. Can anyone clarify the mistake?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Projection operators

Loading...

Similar Threads - Projection operators | Date |
---|---|

I Projective Representations: a simple example | Jan 17, 2018 |

Verifying that a matrix T represents a projection operation | Jun 9, 2014 |

Projection operator | May 26, 2014 |

Questions about a projection operator in the representation theoy of groups | Feb 6, 2010 |

Is a projection operator hermitian? | Dec 23, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**