Can an Onto Function Exist for Every Subset of a Given Set?

In summary: Then use the fact that f is a function to deduce something about f(a') which leads to a contradiction. In summary, the given statement is that for any set A, there is no function f that maps from A to the power set of A. This requires a proof by contradiction, assuming the existence of an onto function f and arriving at a contradiction by producing a subset B that cannot be equal to any f(a). This is achieved by defining B as the set of elements in A that are not members of their image under f, and showing that both the cases of a' being in B or not being in B lead to contradictions.
  • #1
cragar
2,552
3

Homework Statement


Given any set A, there does not exist a function f:A→P(A)
It wants us to do a proof by contradiction and assume there is an onto function.
For each element [itex] a \in A [/itex] f(a) is a particular subset
of A. The assumption that f is onto means that every subset of A appears as f(a)
for some [itex] a \in A [/itex] To arrive at a contradiction, we will produce
a subset [itex] B \subseteq A [/itex] that is not equal to f(a) for
any [itex] a \in A [/itex]
[itex] B=\{a\in A:a\notin f(a)\} [/itex]
If f is onto then it must be the case that B=f(a') for some a' in A.
the contradiction arises when we consider if a' is an element of B.
First show that the case that a' is in B leads to a contradiction.
Now finish the argument by showing that the case a' is not in B
is equally unacceptable.

The Attempt at a Solution


If a' is in B then a' is in A
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
if f(a') is in B then f(a') is some a
in A but this is a contradiction
because we assumed that a was not in f(a).
If a' is not in B then it is not in A and therefore
it is not in anything.
Am I headed the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
cragar said:

The Attempt at a Solution


If a' is in B then a' is in A
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
if f(a') is in B then f(a') is some a
in A but this is a contradiction
because we assumed that a was not in f(a).
If a' is not in B then it is not in A and therefore
it is not in anything.

This is somewhat confused.

Given [itex]f[/itex], [itex]B[/itex] consists of exactly those elements [itex]a \in A[/itex] which are not members of their image, [itex]f(a) \subset A[/itex]. However there could be other elements of A which are members of their image.

The point is that if [itex]f[/itex] is onto, then by definition [itex]B \subset A[/itex] must be the image of some [itex]a' \in A[/itex], so that [itex]f(a') = B[/itex]. Note that, by assumption, [itex]a' \in A[/itex]. Whether [itex]a' \in B[/itex] is another question.

So what happens if [itex]a' \in B[/itex]? That would mean that [itex]a'[/itex] is not a member of its image. But its image is B. This is a contradiction.

Now you need to show that a similar contradiction arises if you assume [itex]a' \notin B[/itex].
 
  • #3
is image f(a)=a
 
  • #4
cragar said:
If a' is in B then a' is in A
a' was chosen to be in A.
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
a' was chosen such that f(a')=B. It cannot be "in B".
is image f(a)=a
a is an element of A; f(a) is a subset of A. They cannot be equal.
Start again at "If a' is in B then " and use the definition of B to deduce something about a'.
 

1. What is the definition of an onto function?

An onto function, also known as a surjective function, is a type of function in which every element in the range of the function is mapped to by at least one element in the domain. In other words, there are no elements in the range that are left unmapped.

2. How can you prove that a function is onto?

To prove that a function is onto, you must show that for every element in the range, there exists at least one element in the domain that maps to it. This can be done by finding the inverse of the function and showing that it exists. Another method is to show that the range of the function is equal to the codomain (the set of all possible outputs).

3. Can a function be both onto and one-to-one?

Yes, a function can be both onto and one-to-one, also known as a bijection. This means that every element in the domain is mapped to a unique element in the range, and every element in the range is mapped to by only one element in the domain.

4. What is the difference between an onto function and a one-to-one function?

The main difference between an onto function and a one-to-one function is that an onto function maps every element in the domain to at least one element in the range, while a one-to-one function maps every element in the domain to a unique element in the range. In other words, an onto function has no unmapped elements in the range, while a one-to-one function has no repeated elements in the range.

5. Can a function be onto if the domain and range are not the same size?

Yes, a function can be onto even if the domain and range are not the same size. This is because the definition of an onto function only requires that every element in the range is mapped to by at least one element in the domain, not that they are mapped to in a one-to-one manner. However, if the domain and range are not the same size, the function cannot be one-to-one, and therefore cannot be a bijection.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
504
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
966
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
550
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
281
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
449
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top