In Dummit and Foote on pages 265-266, a proof is given of the Chinese Remainder Theorem. They claim to proceed by induction, but I cannot see where the induction hypothesis is used.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It seems that they could proved the statement for k=2, and then reduced the statement for k>2 to k=2. Is this induction?

Thank you for your help.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proof in dummit and foote

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**