1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof of attribute in fields

  1. Nov 2, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I need to prove that in any field :

    (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    i dont know how to start the proof ... I know all the attributes of fields but i got stuck
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 2, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    welcome to pf!

    hi fastidious1! welcome to pf! :smile:
    commutative, associative, … ? :wink:
     
  4. Nov 2, 2012 #3
    ok, and what about a*a=a^2 ?
    do I need to supply a proof for this product?
    and a*b+a*b=2ab
    can i say that it is axioms?
    tnx!
     
  5. Nov 2, 2012 #4

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    no, that's just the definition of (or another name for) a2 ! :smile:
    imo, the question is a bit weird …

    "2" isn't in any of the axioms

    "2" needs to be defined, and the question hasn't defined it :frown:

    i think you'll have to define it! (how? :wink:)​
     
  6. Nov 2, 2012 #5
    what is 2 ?
    2=1+1
    in any field the number 1 is exist and in any field addition is already defined so we have 1+1 we call it 2. we can also can to call to all the following numbers 3'4
    it is doesn't mean that any field include all the natural number. it is possible that in some condition that 2=0(like in field F2) does it correct ? tnx
     
  7. Nov 2, 2012 #6

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    hi fastidious1! :smile:
    yup, that's perfect :smile:

    there's a 1, and 1 + 1 must be something, so we call it 2 …

    of course, you still need to prove that a + a = 2a ! :wink:
    yes …

    but it doesn't matter, because the original equation would still be true! :tongue2:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Proof of attribute in fields
  1. A proof (Replies: 3)

  2. Trig Proof (Replies: 4)

  3. Geometrical Proof (Replies: 6)

  4. "Arithmetic?" proof (Replies: 3)

Loading...