Suppose f(z) is analytic in a region R including the point z(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{0}. Prove that f(z) = f(z_{0}) + f'(z_{0})(z-z_{0}) + η(z-z_{0}) where η ~> 0 as z ~> z_{0}.

this is actually a lemma my book proves first before actually proving L'Hospital's rule. I understood how they used the lemma to prove the rule but i don't really understand the logic in proving this lemma. my book did:

Let [f(z) - f(z_{0})]/(z-z_{0}) - f'(z_{0}) = η so that f(z) = f(z_{0}) + f'(z_{0})(z - z_{0}) = η(z-z_{0}).

Then, since f(z) is analytic at z_{0}, we have as required:

lim (z ~> z_{0}) of η = lim (z ~> z_{0}) of [f(z) - f(z_{0})]/(z-z_{0}) - f'(z_{0}) = f'(z_{0}) - f'(z_{0}) = 0.

i don't understand how f(z) = f(z_{0}) + f'(z_{0})(z - z_{0}) = η(z-z_{0}). shouldn't it be f(z) = η(z-z_{0}) + f'(z_{0})(z - z_{0}) + f(z_{0}) since they let [f(z) - f(z_{0})]/(z-z_{0}) - f'(z_{0}) = η?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proof of L'Hospital's Rule

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proof L'Hospital's Rule | Date |
---|---|

B Proof of a limit rule | Dec 19, 2017 |

B Proof of quotient rule using Leibniz differentials | Jun 10, 2017 |

L'Hospital proof problem | Nov 9, 2012 |

A Kinder, Gentler, Longer L'Hospital Proof | Feb 9, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**