I'm looking for feedback on my answer to the following question (if my proof has holes in it, etc.) In particular, I've tacitly assumed that ψ is real. Does this extend naturally to complex ψ? Or don't I have to worry about that?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Problem 2.2from Griffiths' Intro to QM:

Show thatEmust exceed the minimum value ofV(x) for every normalizable solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation. What is the classical analog to this statement?Hint: Rewrite Equation 2.4 in the form

[tex]\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} [V(x) - E]\psi;[/tex]

if [itex]E < V_\text{min}[/itex], then ψ and its second derviative always have the same sign—argue that such a function cannot be normalized.

My attempt:

Assume both [itex]E < V_\text{min}[/itex] and ψ is normalizable. Then, as stated in the question, ψ and [itex]\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}[/itex] always have the same sign. Moreover, normalizability requires that

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \psi = 0

\qquad \text{and} \qquad

\lim_{x \rightarrow -\infty} \psi = 0.[/tex]

ψ cannot be zero everywhere (which is not normalizable), and must therefore either have a non-zero global maximum or a non-zero global minimum (or both). Moreover, since ψ asymptotes to zero at both ends, we can say that ψ must have either a positive global maximum, or a negative global minimum (or both).

Suppose ψ has a positive global maximum at [itex]x=x_\text{max}[/itex] . Then [itex]\psi(x_\text{max})[/itex] is positive, and because [itex]E<V_\text{min}[/itex], so is [itex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x_\text{max})[/itex]. But [itex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x_\text{max})[/itex] must be negative, since it is a local (as well as a global) maximum. Contradiction.

Similarly (by exchanging all ‘maximum’s with ‘minimum’s and all ‘positive’s with ‘negative’s), ψ cannot have a negative global minimum. This contradiction allows us to say that if [itex]E<V_\text{min}[/itex], then ψ is not normalizable. QED

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proof that E > V(x) in TISE?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proof TISE | Date |
---|---|

I Solutions to TDSE from TISE | Oct 18, 2017 |

I Representations of the Poincaré group: question in a proof | Jul 8, 2017 |

A Help with proof of eq. 2.64 of Intro. to Quantum Mechanics | May 16, 2017 |

I Proof of some identities regarding spin angular momentum. | Apr 29, 2017 |

A Proof - gauge transformation of yang mills field strength | Mar 23, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**