1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof that NxN~N

  1. Mar 26, 2014 #1
    I thought of a way to use Gaussian integers to show that NxN~N
    We look at (1+i)(1-i) and this corresponds to the coordinate (1,1)
    then (1+2i)(1-2i)-->(1,2) then (1+3i)(1-3i)-->(1,3).... and you keep doing this, so we have injected NxN into N.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 27, 2014 #2
    actually there is a problem with this (x,y) and (y,x) get mapped to the same integer
     
  4. Mar 27, 2014 #3

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    It looks to me like your mapping goes from N to N x N. Is that what you intended? (1 + i)(1 - i) = 1 - i2 = 1 + 1 = 2. So here the integer 2 is mapped to (1, 1). Did you mean for it to go the other way?
     
  5. Mar 27, 2014 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    The fundamental problem is that N x N is NOT equivalent to N, it has the same cardinality as the set of rational numbers. It appears that your assignment is "one-to-one" but not "onto".
     
  6. Mar 27, 2014 #5

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    But ##\mathbb{N}## is equivalent to ##\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}##...
     
  7. Mar 27, 2014 #6
    The rationals and the naturals do have the same cardinality.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook