Proof with intersection of subspaces

  • Thread starter Dafe
  • Start date
  • #1
Dafe
145
0

Homework Statement


Suppose L, M, and N are subspaces of a vector space.

(a)
Show that the equation
[tex] L \cap (M+N) = (L \cap M)+(L \cap N) [/tex]
is not necessarily true.

(b)
Prove that
[tex] L \cap (M+(L \cap N))=(L \cap M) + (L \cap N) [/tex]

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)
I let
[tex]
\begin{aligned}
M=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\
N=&\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\
L=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}
\end{aligned}
[/tex]

Then,

[tex]
\begin{aligned}
M+N=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1)\}\\
L \cap (M+N)=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\\
L \cap M=&\;span\{(0,0)\}\\
L \cap N=&\;span\{(0,0)\}
\end{aligned}
[/tex]

and the equation is not true.

This in fact leads me to believe that the equation does not hold when [tex]L \subset (M+N) [/tex], because then [tex]L \cap (M+N) = L[/tex] and [tex]L \cap M[/tex] and [tex]L \cap N[/tex] are something else.
I would guess they turn out to be something like [tex]L-L \cap N[/tex] and [tex]L-L \cap M[/tex], respectively..

(b)

[tex] L \cap M + L \cap (L \cap N) = (L \cap M) + (L \cap N) [/tex]

That's all I can come up with on my own.
Any suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,826
2,474
For (b), show that [itex]L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)[/itex] and [itex](L \cap M) + (L \cap N) \subset L \cap (M+(L \cap N))[/itex].

For example, assume [itex]x \in L \cap (M+(L \cap N))[/itex]. Then [itex]x \in M+(L \cap N)[/itex], so you can write [itex]x = m + n[/itex] where [itex]m \in M[/itex] and [itex]n \in L \cap N[/itex]. If you can show that [itex]m \in L[/itex], then you'll have that [itex]m \in (L \cap M)[/itex] and consequently that [itex]x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N)[/itex], so [itex]L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)[/itex].
 
  • #3
Dafe
145
0
If you can show that [itex]m \in L[/itex], then you'll have that [itex]m \in (L \cap M)[/itex] and consequently that [itex]x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N)[/itex], so [itex]L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)[/itex].

From our assumption that [tex]x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) [/tex], we have that [tex]x\in L[/tex].
Since [tex]x=m+n[/tex] we have that [tex]m\in L[/tex] and [tex]n \in L [/tex], so
[tex] L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) [/tex].

Is that it or do I have to show that [tex] (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N)) [/tex]?

Suppose [tex] x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) [/tex] and [tex]x=m+n[/tex] where [tex]m\in (L\cap M)[/tex] and [tex]n\in (L\cap N)[/tex].
Then [tex]m\in L[/tex] and [tex]n\in L[/tex].
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
 
  • #4
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,826
2,474
From our assumption that [tex]x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) [/tex], we have that [tex]x\in L[/tex].
Since [tex]x=m+n[/tex] we have that [tex]m\in L[/tex] and [tex]n \in L [/tex], so
[tex] L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) [/tex].
Wait, how do you know that m is in L from knowing x is in L? M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.

Is that it or do I have to show that [tex] (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N)) [/tex]?
You have to show both directions to prove equality.

Suppose [tex] x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) [/tex] and [tex]x=m+n[/tex] where [tex]m\in (L\cap M)[/tex] and [tex]n\in (L\cap N)[/tex].
Then [tex]m\in L[/tex] and [tex]n\in L[/tex].
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
You know that [itex]m \in M[/itex] and [itex]n \in L\cap N[/itex], so it follows that [itex]x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N)[/itex]. If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of [itex]L\cap (M+(L\cap N))[/itex].

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.
 
  • #5
Dafe
145
0
M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.
Since [tex]m+n \in L,\;n\in L[/tex] and [tex]L[/tex] is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that [tex]m \in L[/tex]?

You know that [itex]m \in M[/itex] and [itex]n \in L\cap N[/itex], so it follows that [itex]x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N)[/itex]. If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of [itex]L\cap (M+(L\cap N))[/itex].

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.

From [tex](L \cap N)[/tex] I know that [tex]n \in L[/tex], and from [tex](L \cap M)[/tex] I know that [tex]m \in L[/tex].
[tex]m+n[/tex] must also be in [tex]L[/tex] since it is a subspace.
Now, [tex]m+n \in (M+(L \cap N))[/tex] and [tex]m+n \in L[/tex] and so [tex]x[/tex] is an element of [tex]L \cap (M+(L\cap N))[/tex].

Is this any good?

Thanks!
 
  • #6
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,826
2,474
Since [tex]m+n \in L,\;n\in L[/tex] and [tex]L[/tex] is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that [tex]m \in L[/tex]?
Yes.
From [tex](L \cap N)[/tex] I know that [tex]n \in L[/tex], and from [tex](L \cap M)[/tex] I know that [tex]m \in L[/tex].
[tex]m+n[/tex] must also be in [tex]L[/tex] since it is a subspace.
Now, [tex]m+n \in (M+(L \cap N))[/tex] and [tex]m+n \in L[/tex] and so [tex]x[/tex] is an element of [tex]L \cap (M+(L\cap N))[/tex].

Is this any good?
Perfect.
 
  • #7
Dafe
145
0
Thank you very much :)
 
  • #8
36,881
8,933
One other thing that I didn't notice coming up in this thread.
Dafe said:
[tex]\begin{aligned}M=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\N=&\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\L=&\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\end{aligned}[/tex]
There is no need to include (0,0) as a vector in your span{} sets. It's not incorrect to include it, but it needlessly clutters things up. You could have more simply said that
M = span{(1, 0)}
N = span{(0, 1)}
L = span{(1, 1)}
All of these are one-dimensional subspaces of R2, and for each the entire subspace is generated by scalar multiples of the given vector. Choose the scalar to be 0 for each, and you get the zero vector.
 
  • #9
Dafe
145
0
That makes sense and looks prettier. Thanks.
 

Suggested for: Proof with intersection of subspaces

Replies
12
Views
678
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
416
Replies
3
Views
387
Replies
5
Views
282
Replies
15
Views
489
Replies
10
Views
891
Replies
4
Views
499
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
587
Replies
10
Views
827
Top