• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Proofs for recursive sets using induction

  • Thread starter evanx
  • Start date
4
0
T* is a recursive definition, a subset of the family of ternary strings. Let T* be the smallest set such that:

BASIS: 0 is in T*
INDUCTION STEP: If x,y in T*, then so are x0y, 1x2 and 2 x1.

a) Prove that if k in N, then there is no string in T* with exactly [tex]3^k +1[/tex] zeros.
b) Prove that if k in N, then there is no string in T* that has exactly [tex] 2^(^k^+^1^) [/tex] digits.
c) Prove that there is no string in T* whose digits sum to 97.

I have started drawing combinations of elements in T* and am at a lost for the correlation about x0y and the zeros for a). As for b), I suspect that the answer has soemthing to do with any string being one with odd numbered digits since I can have x, x0y, ax0yb, etc. But I have no idea on how to formalise my suspicions. For part c), I fail to see the connection between the sum of T*'s digits and x,y.

Please help, I have wrecked my brains for a week over this.
 
4
0
Any suggestions?
 

Related Threads for: Proofs for recursive sets using induction

  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
431

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top