Proof Set Theory: A, B, C, X, Y in E

In summary: Yep, that looks like a homework problem. It's curious that you would simply copy it here, rather than explain what you've done, and where you're having trouble, so that we could help you work through the problem...I tried to solve the problem by using the definition of equality of sets and it gets very lengthy ,is there another way??
  • #1
poutsos.A
102
1
Let A,B,C,X,Y be subsets of E,and A' MEAN the compliment of A in E i.e A'=E-A,and

A^B = A [tex]\cap[/tex] B

Then prove the following:

a) (A^B^X)U(A^B^C^X^Y)U(A^X^A') = A^B^X

b) (A^B^C)U(A' ^ B^C)U B' U C' = E

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yep, that looks like a homework problem. It's curious that you would simply copy it here, rather than explain what you've done, and where you're having trouble, so that we could help you work through the problem...
 
  • #3
I tried to solve the problem by using the definition of equality of sets and it gets very lengthy ,is there another way??

Thanks

A=B <====> (xεΑ <------>xεB)
 
  • #4
Hurkyl said:
Yep, that looks like a homework problem. It's curious that you would simply copy it here, rather than explain what you've done, and where you're having trouble, so that we could help you work through the problem...


a) (A^B^X)U(A^B^C^X^Y)U(A^X^A') = A^B^X

b) (A^B^C)U(A' ^ B^C)U B' U C' = E


Let xε[(A^B^X)U(A^B^C^X^Y)U(A^X^A')] <======> (xεΑ & xεB & xεX) v (xεA & xεB & xεC & xεX & xεY ) v ( xεA & xεX & ~xεA)


That is how far i could go .


Please continue the problem for me.

For the 2nd problem it is the same sticky situation.

Thanks
 
  • #5
There seems to be something missing in the first problem.
It is to show

[tex]
\left(A \cap B \cap X\right) \cup \left(A \cap B \cap C \cap X \cap Y\right) \cup \left(A \cap X \cap A'\right) = A \cap B \cap X
[/tex]

, correct? To shorten my typing I'll refer to the RHS (right hand side) and LHS (left hand side) of this statement.

To prove RHS is contained in LHS.
Suppose [tex] w \in A \cap B \cap X [/tex]. Then (with all the ugly glory)

[tex]
w \in A \cap B \cap X \subseteq (A \cap B \cap X) \cup (A \cap B \cap C \cap X \cap Y) \cup (A \cap B \cap A')
[/tex]

so we know that LHS is a subset of RHS.

Now to the other inclusion. Suppose [tex] w \in LHS [/tex].

Case 1: If [tex] w \in A \cap B \cap X [/tex] we are done.
Case 2: If

[tex]
w \in A \cap B \cap C \cap X \cap Y
[/tex]

then [tex] w \in A \cap B \cap X [/tex] and again we are done.

Case 3: (This is where I believe the problem lives). Suppose

[tex]
w \in A \cap X \cap A'
[/tex]

We know that both [tex] w \in A [/tex] and [tex] w \in X [/tex], and [tex] x \in A' [/tex], but with the information given we cannot conclude that [tex] w \in B [/tex] (and now the latex preview is acting up) - we simply don't have enough knowledge of the relationships of the individual sets to make this conclusion.
 
  • #6
While looking through the book; Set Theory And Logic by ROBERT R. STOLL, i met this problem on page 22 ,exercise 5.3 (a) and not doing homework.

The other problem is on the same page ,exercise 5.3 (b)

So i do not think the problem 5.3(a) is not wrong
 
  • #7
poutsos.A said:
Let A,B,C,X,Y be subsets of E,and A' MEAN the compliment of A in E i.e A'=E-A,and

A^B = A [tex]\cap[/tex] B

Then prove the following:

a) (A^B^X)U(A^B^C^X^Y)U(A^X^A') = A^B^X

b) (A^B^C)U(A' ^ B^C)U B' U C' = E

Thanks

Are you sure you typed the problem correctly? If so, all of Statdad's deductions are correct so far. Now, when we look at case 3: [tex]w\in A\cap X\cap A'[/tex]. This says that w is an element of A and w is an element of A' (the complement of A). What is wrong with this statement??

Another way to think of it: We know, in general, that [tex]A\cap B=B\cap A[/tex] and that [tex](A\cap B)\cap C=A\cap(B\cap C)[/tex]. Using this, what is [tex]A\cap X\cap A'[/tex]? More specifically, what is [tex]A\cap A'[/tex] for any set?
 
  • #8
jjou said:
Are you sure you typed the problem correctly? If so, all of Statdad's deductions are correct so far. Now, when we look at case 3: [tex]w\in A\cap X\cap A'[/tex]. This says that w is an element of A and w is an element of A' (the complement of A). What is wrong with this statement??

Another way to think of it: We know, in general, that [tex]A\cap B=B\cap A[/tex] and that [tex](A\cap B)\cap C=A\cap(B\cap C)[/tex]. Using this, what is [tex]A\cap X\cap A'[/tex]? More specifically, what is [tex]A\cap A'[/tex] for any set?

Where are you getting at? I typed the problem straight from the book.

Thanks for the help.
 
  • #9
If that is indeed the problem in the book, fine. Then answer my question:

What is [tex]A\cap A'[/tex] for any set A? In other words, what is the intersection of a set and its complement?
 
  • #10
The empty set:Φ
 
  • #11
There you go. Can you do the rest of the problem now?
 
  • #12
NO because i cannot follow why all the above cases and any added should lead us to the desired result.
 

What is Proof Set Theory?

Proof Set Theory is a mathematical framework that studies the relationships and properties of sets, which are collections of objects. It aims to provide a rigorous and logical approach to understanding and analyzing sets and their elements.

What are the five elements in "Proof Set Theory: A, B, C, X, Y in E"?

The five elements in this notation refer to sets A, B, C, X, and Y, which are all subsets of a universal set E. Each set can contain any number of elements, and they can overlap or be disjoint.

How is "Proof Set Theory: A, B, C, X, Y in E" different from other set theories?

This notation specifically emphasizes the use of a universal set E, which serves as a reference for the other sets. This allows for more precise and detailed analysis of relationships between sets and their elements.

What is the purpose of using "Proof Set Theory: A, B, C, X, Y in E" in scientific research?

Proof Set Theory provides a rigorous and logical framework for analyzing and understanding sets, which are essential in many fields of science, including mathematics, computer science, and physics. It allows researchers to make precise statements and deductions based on the properties of sets and their elements.

What are some practical applications of "Proof Set Theory: A, B, C, X, Y in E"?

Proof Set Theory has many practical applications, including data analysis, computer programming, and cryptography. It is also used in various branches of mathematics, such as topology, algebra, and logic.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
506
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
862
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
452
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
588
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
692
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
495
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top