1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proofs with Matricies

  1. Sep 15, 2012 #1

    joedozzi

    User Avatar

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    2. Relevant equations

    Question 1.jpg


    3. The attempt at a solution

    -(y, x) = -(YX-XY)
    = XY-YX

    Can I do this or would I have to define a matrix X= ( a b c d ) Y= ( e f g h)

    And prove it that way? I am just really confused
     
    joedozzi, Sep 15, 2012
  2. jcsd
    Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org
  3. Sep 15, 2012 #2

    Mark44

    User Avatar
    Insights Author

    Staff: Mentor

    What you have above would work, but your notation is awful! Try to use the notation as given in the problem. Also notice that uppercase letters represent matrices, and lowercase letters represent the entries in a matrix.

    Assuming that matrices X and Y are in M, then [X, Y] = ?
    Keep working with the expressions you get until you end up with -[Y, X].
     
    Mark44, Sep 15, 2012
  4. Sep 15, 2012 #3

    joedozzi

    User Avatar

    [X, Y]= YX- XY
    Thus [Y, X]= XY- YX
    then -[Y, X]= -(XY- YX)
    then -[Y, X]= -XY +YX

    Like that? So i don't have to use matricies with variables, just use X and Y to represent a matrix?
     
    joedozzi, Sep 15, 2012
  5. Sep 15, 2012 #4

    Mark44

    User Avatar
    Insights Author

    Staff: Mentor

    This is easier to follow.

    [X, Y] = XY - YX = -(YX - XY) = -[Y, X]

    Can you say why each pair of successive equal expressions is valid?
     
    Mark44, Sep 15, 2012
  6. Sep 15, 2012 #5

    joedozzi

    User Avatar

    Properties of Matricies?
     
    joedozzi, Sep 15, 2012
  7. Sep 15, 2012 #6

    joedozzi

    User Avatar

    And Thanks your honestly a huge help!
     
    joedozzi, Sep 15, 2012
  8. Sep 16, 2012 #7

    Mark44

    User Avatar
    Insights Author

    Staff: Mentor

    That's pretty vague. Also, there are a number of steps. One reason doesn't fit them all.
     
    Mark44, Sep 16, 2012
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Proofs with Matricies

  1. Complex numbers, matricies and Kirchoff's laws (Replies: 3)

  2. Express this 2x2 matrix as a linear combo of thoes other 2x2 matricies (Replies: 3)

  3. Triangular matricies and subspaces (Replies: 2)

  4. A proof (Replies: 3)

  5. Proof by Induction - Divisibility Proofs (Replies: 3)

Loading...