- #1

- 991

- 1

## Main Question or Discussion Point

do you kinow a simple and convincing argument for the fact that proper time is a relativistic invariant?

- Thread starter bernhard.rothenstein
- Start date

- #1

- 991

- 1

do you kinow a simple and convincing argument for the fact that proper time is a relativistic invariant?

- #2

- 329

- 0

Have a look heredo you kinow a simple and convincing argument for the fact that proper time is a relativistic invariant?

In the case of inertial motion proper time reduces to:

[tex]c\Delta \tau=\sqrt(c^2\Delta t^2-\Delta x^2)[/tex]

Since [tex]c^2\Delta t^2-\Delta x^2[/tex] is frame invariant , it follows that in the case of inertial motion proper time is also invariant.

The above proof was facilitated by using the fact that [tex]dx/dt=constant[/tex]. What happens in the case of [tex]dx/dt[/tex] not constant? Since the integrand used in the definition of [tex]\tau[/tex] varies with time, we cannot use the reasoning seen above anymore. Most likely, in the general case, proper time is no longer an invariant.

Last edited:

- #3

daniel_i_l

Gold Member

- 867

- 0

Also, all observers agree on the ST interval between events. the proper time is equal to this interval.

- #4

- 5,490

- 720

To amplify daniel_i_l's comment:"Proper time" between 2 events is the time that is measured by an observer moving from event1 to event2. How could different observers disagree on what some other observer measured? (they can all measure different times between the events but they all agree on what one "chosen" observer measured)

Of course,

More correctly, the interval is a measure of theAlso, all observers agree on the ST interval between events. the proper time is equal to this interval.

The time associated with the "

As daniel_i_l suggests above,

probably the simplest argument just relies on

asking what that clock-owner measured, more specifically:

What you then might ask is how his clock was constructed and how it registers the ticks, i.e. at what events do those ticks occur?

- #5

- 991

- 1

probably the simplest argument just relies on

asking what that clock-owner measured, more specifically: count of the number of ticks his clock registered. No one can dispute that!

What you then might ask is how his clock was constructed and how it registers the ticks, i.e. at what events do those ticks occur?

__________________

+---

Please confirm if I am right interpreting your help.

You and I we are in relative uniform motion. We have identical wristwatches and let tau be the period of the two clocks as measured by me and by you respectively. Both clocks read a zero time when we are located at the same point in space. We make the convention to measure N ticks of our clocks and so the time intervals Ntau. Special relativity teaches us that counted numbers are invariants and what we measure under such conditions are proper time intervals having for both of us the same magnitude.:rofl:

Thanks you and to all participants on my thread.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 22K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 31

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 36

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 445