Proper Time

  • B
  • Thread starter Zephaniah
  • Start date
  • #1
30
2

Main Question or Discussion Point

What is proper time? How can I solve proper time? "There is only one frame of reference in which clock is at rest, and there are infinitely many in which it is moving." What does it mean?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,280
636
If you take 2 events, you can define the elapsed time between them in different ways, and this will give you different answers in general. That's the idea of relativity. One way to define the time between these events, is to use a clock of an observer which travels between these 2 events. The time elapsed on its clock is what we call the proper time. I think this also refers to your quote, but if you give quotes, it is common here to say where you get it from.

I'm not sure what you mean by "solving proper time", though.
 
  • #3
29,072
5,340
What is proper time? How can I solve proper time?
Given some time like worldline, proper time is the time measured by a clock traveling along that worldline. It is given by ##\tau=\int_P \sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}dt##
 
  • #4
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
5,971
4,544
Proper time is the time measured by some chosen clock - e.g. your watch - travelling between two events.

If it is possible to get from one event to the other without exceeding the speed of light then the proper time of a clock moving inertially between the events is the same as the coordinate time between the events in a frame where that clock is at rest.

Dale gave the correct formula to calculate the proper time between two events along some path. However, do note that in the case where the clock is moving inertially, v is not a function of t and the integral is trivial.
 
  • #5
19,941
4,102
I think what you are asking is, "Is it possible for observers that are traveling in frames of reference that are not at rest with respect to the specified clock to determine, exclusively from measurements in their own frame of reference, what the change in proper time is on the subject clock?" The answer is yes.
 
  • #6
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,676
912
To measure proper time, you need a clock. You start the clock at some event, and you stop the clock at some other event. The reading of the clock is the proper time.

Proper time is the simplest sort of time. There are more complicated notions of time. I am guessing that your notion of "time" includes some notion of "now". The notion of now requires some mechanism to tell when two events at different locations in space occur "at the same time", this is usually called "synchronization".

Proper time, being the simplest sort of time, doesn't require any notion of "now". It only requires clocks - stopwatches, basically.

If you want to know more about other notions of time and how they relate to proper time, ask. But I think the above explanation of proper time is sufficient to answer what you asked, though it may or may not tell you what you wanted to know. If it's not sufficient, perhaps asking more questions would clarify what you needed.
 
  • #7
30
2
Thank you for the explanations up there. For everyone's information, I am a college student and this topic "Proper Time" is my report. And I am really having a hard time how to understand this concept that is why I still don't have a concrete idea about this one.
 
  • #8
30
2
Now, I understand that Proper time is what the observer's clock reads. Right? How about if there are 2 observers with their own clock at the same event but they come up with a conclusion that the event happen with a different time in there clock which one will I consider as proper time?
 
  • #9
19,941
4,102
Thank you for the explanations up there. For everyone's information, I am a college student and this topic "Proper Time" is my report. And I am really having a hard time how to understand this concept that is why I still don't have a concrete idea about this one.
The questions you asked in your initial post were very general. Maybe it would help if you asked more specific questions. Is this your only discomfort with the basics of special relativity? Or are other aspects of special relativity limiting your ability to understand property time.
 
  • #10
30
2
If you take 2 events, you can define the elapsed time between them in different ways, and this will give you different answers in general. That's the idea of relativity.


Does it mean that each observer is correct whatever they state of what they have observed?
 
  • #11
30
2
The questions you asked in your initial post were very general. Maybe it would help if you asked more specific questions. Is this your only discomfort with the basics of special relativity? Or are other aspects of special relativity limiting your ability to understand property time.

My teacher told me that there is a computation for proper time and I as I browse in the internet the formulas are confusing. I think I need a step by step instruction to solve it.
 
  • #12
19,941
4,102
Now, I understand that Proper time is what the observer's clock reads. Right? How about if there are 2 observers with their own clock at the same event but they come up with a conclusion that the event happen with a different time in there clock which one will I consider as proper time?
If the two observers are at rest relative to one another (and, thus, they are both physically present at both events) their clocks will both show the same elapsed proper time. If the two observers are in relative motion, then they can't both be physically present at both of the two events.
 
  • #13
19,941
4,102
My teacher told me that there is a computation for proper time and I as I browse in the internet the formulas are confusing. I think I need a step by step instruction to solve it.
Dale gave the equation in post #3. Is this the equation you are finding complicated to solve? Which part are you finding complicated?
 
  • #14
30
2
If the two observers are at rest relative to one another (and, thus, they are both physically present at both events) their clocks will both show the same elapsed proper time. If the two observers are in relative motion, then they can't both be physically present at both of the two events.
Is it the same with inertial reference and relativity of simultaineity?
 
  • #15
19,941
4,102
Is it the same with inertial reference and relativity of simultaineity?
Sorry, I have no idea what you are asking here. It seems to me your problems are much broader than just not understanding proper time.
 
  • #16
30
2
Dale gave the equation in post #3. Is this the equation you are finding complicated to solve? Which part are you finding complicated?

Yes Sir. That formula is too complicated for me.
 
  • #17
19,941
4,102
Yes Sir. That formula is too complicated for me.
In what way? Have you not had integral calculus?
 
  • #18
30
2
Sorry, I have no idea what you are asking here. It seems to me your problems are much broader than just not understanding proper time.
My problem is how am I going to teach the concept of proper time to my classmates and how am I going to show some problem solving to them.
 
  • #19
30
2
In what way? Have you not had integral calculus?
Yes Sir. I haven't learn integral calculus yet.
 
  • #20
19,941
4,102
My problem is how am I going to teach the concept of proper time to my classmates and how am I going to show some problem solving to them.
Let's see your attempt to do this so far. What is your best shot at explaining this?
 
  • #21
30
2
Let's see your attempt to do this so far. What is your best shot at explaining this?
Maybe I'll draw an illustration showing an observer inside the event and another observer outside the event. Then I'll ask them if who among the two know the proper time. Then the answer will be both have observed the event at a different time but both of them has the proper time in their own reference.
 
  • #22
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
5,971
4,544
Concepts you may find helpful:
- Interval ##\Delta s^2=c^2\Delta t^2-(\Delta x^2+\Delta y^2 +\Delta z^2)##
- Worldlines
- Block universe
- Events
- Minkowski diagram

The block universe is 4d spacetime. Events are points in space at a given time. Worldlines are lines joining events - your worldline joins all the events you passed through in your life. Interval is the generalisation of Pythagorean distance to spacetime. You may wish to look up the relationship between proper time and interval, and then think about what a worldline's proper time means.

Note also that "proper" in this context is being used in its original Latin sense of "one's own", rather like "property". Not in the modern English sense of "correct".
 
  • #23
19,941
4,102
Yes Sir. I haven't learn integral calculus yet.
If you confine attention to inertial frames of reference that are in relative motion with respect to one another with velocity v, then the equation simplifies to ##\Delta \tau=\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}\Delta t##. Imagine that you have a single observer with a clock that is at rest in his frame of reference, and measures the time interval between the two events ##\Delta \tau## (he is physically present at both events). Imagine that this observer is moving with velocity v relative to a (stationary) group of observers strung out along the route from the first event to the second event, and the two observers physically present at the two events write down the times on their synchronized clocks at which the two events occur. They then get together and compare notes, and, when they do, they find that, according to their clocks, the time interval between the two events is ##\Delta t##. The equation above will tell you the relationship between ##\Delta \tau## and ##\Delta t## (which will not be the same).
 
  • #24
19,941
4,102
Maybe I'll draw an illustration showing an observer inside the event and another observer outside the event. Then I'll ask them if who among the two know the proper time. Then the answer will be both have observed the event at a different time but both of them has the proper time in their own reference.
Only the observer who is at rest and personally observes the two events can be physically present at both of the events. The other observer you are referring to (in a different frame of reference) can be physically present at either of the events, but not both of them.
 
  • #25
30
2
If you confine attention to inertial frames of reference that are in relative motion with respect to one another with velocity v, then the equation simplifies to ##\Delta \tau=\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}\Delta t##. Imagine that you have a single observer with a clock that is at rest in his frame of reference, and measures the time interval between the two events ##\Delta \tau##. Imagine that this observer is moving with velocity v relative to a (stationary) group of observers strung out along the route from the first event to the second event, and the two observers physically present at the two events write down the times on their synchronized clocks at which the two events occur. They then get together and compare notes, and, when they do, they find that, according to their clocks, the time interval between the two events is ##\Delta t##. The equation above will tell you the relationship between ##\Delta \tau## and ##\Delta t## (which will not be the same).
This one formula is much easier than before but I think I need to try this one first. May I ask if you have any problem solving for me to solve?
 

Related Threads on Proper Time

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
22K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
445
Top