Is an Electron Both a Wave and a Particle Simultaneously?

In summary: However, to understand its properties in various situations, we need to use different theoretical approaches. In most cases, the electron is treated as a classical particle in classical mechanics, but in other cases, such as in the double-slit experiment, it exhibits wave-like behavior. This is because at the quantum level, particles do not behave like classical particles but rather as quantum objects, described by wave functions and probability amplitudes. Thus, the electron can exhibit both wave and particle-like properties, depending on the experimental set-up and the theoretical approach used to describe it. This is a fundamental aspect of quantum theory and is not fully understood, but it has been confirmed by numerous experiments.
  • #1
Deepak K Kapur
164
5
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
At the same time: all the time
 
  • #3
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, QuantumQuest and Delta2
  • #4
vanhees71 said:
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).

Then what is it? Just probability!
 
  • #5
Deepak K Kapur said:
Then what is it?
It is neither a wave nor a particle. It is a quantum object.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #6
vanhees71 said:
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).

Nugatory said:
It is neither a wave nor a particle. It is a quantum object.

Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
 
  • #7
If you could ask an electron what it is, I bet it would answer like Popeye the Sailor:

IAmWhatIAm.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory and Delta2
  • #8
The heavies (i.e. the theoretical physicists like vanH and Nu) are absolutely right. But for many down-to-earth 'practical' physics, treating the buggers as particles or treating them as waves can be quite adequate. If you are describing something that forces you to switch between these interpretations you are probably in trouble. The electrons themselves certainly don't change their behaviour because you use the one or the other paradigm to describe their behaviour.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #9
Deepak K Kapur said:
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?

I'll add to the fun. In my field, we treat them like classical particles. And it works!

Look at particle-simulation codes such as PARMELA, and other PIC codes. They all threat electrons as classical particles to model the electron beam going through various components in a particle accelerator.

Your question is ambiguous because you did not put ANY context to it. If you ask someone if Special Relativity is valid in building a house, you'll get laughed at. There are cases where it is easier to treat something in some formulation, while in others, it may be more accurate to treat it in another formulation.

I also strongly suggest you read some of the FAQs, especially on the similar question regarding photons, and whether they are waves or particles. The answer is applicable to this one. Notice the fact that even calling it a "wave" or a "particle" is incorrect or inaccurate at best. YOU have already a classical imprint in your head of what a "particle" is and what a "wave" is. Yet, these are not accurate description of quantum particles, simply because they are not physical waves (meaning they are not really "waves") and they really do not have well-defined boundary in space like a ping-pong ball (meaning they are not really "particles").

So even the insistence that they can be one or the other, or combination of both is not accurate either!

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest
  • #10
Delta² said:
Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
For electrons (and other massive particles, as opposed to photons) you don't need QFT. Ordinary "first-quantization" non-relativistic QM, the stuff you'll learn in a college-level intro to QM, is a good enough starting point.

Some interactions with an electron demonstrate interference and diffraction, which we generally consider to be wave-like behavior; other interactions are consistent with the electron being at a particular place at a particular time, which we generally consider to be particle-like behavior. As ZapperZ has pointed out, in many problems you can just choose one or the other model and stick with it and get altogether satisfactory results.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest and BvU
  • #11
Deepak K Kapur said:
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?

Instantaneously, of course. :biggrin:
 
  • #12
DrChinese said:
Instantaneously, of course. :biggrin:

This word 'instantaneous' has confused many a generation, imo.
 
  • #13
I always thought the standard answer is that depending on the experiment you can interpret the electron as particle and in others as wave.

Although there is the controversial experiment by Afshar which interprets as both at the same time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afshar_experiment
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #14
Delta² said:
Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
An electron and its antiparticle, the positron, are described as a Dirac fermion with the mass of ~511 keV. It carries electric and weak-isospin charge but no color. That describes completely what we know about the electron within the Standard Model of elementary particles.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba

1. What is the mass of an electron?

The mass of an electron is approximately 9.11 x 10^-31 kilograms. It is considered to be one of the fundamental particles that make up atoms.

2. What is the charge of an electron?

The charge of an electron is -1.602 x 10^-19 coulombs. This negative charge is equal in magnitude to the positive charge of a proton, making atoms electrically neutral.

3. What is the spin of an electron?

The spin of an electron is a quantum property that can be either "up" or "down". It is a fundamental property of particles and cannot be directly observed, but its effects can be measured.

4. What is the role of electrons in atoms?

Electrons play a crucial role in atoms as they orbit around the nucleus, which contains protons and neutrons. They are responsible for the chemical and physical properties of elements and determine an atom's reactivity and bonding behavior.

5. Can electrons be found in specific locations within an atom?

No, according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the exact position and momentum of an electron cannot be known simultaneously. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the exact location of an electron within an atom.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
917
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
246
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
23
Views
383
Replies
8
Views
775
Replies
12
Views
834
Replies
6
Views
816
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
980
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top