Consider the amplitude for a free particle to propogate from [itex]\vec{x}_0[/itex] to [tex]\vec{x}[/tex]:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

U(t) = \left\langle \vec{x} | e^{-i H t} | \vec{x}_0 \right\rangle

[/tex]

I guess I don't understand what it means for a particle to propogate from one "position" to the next. If the particle is not in a position eigenstate, then it does not have a well-defined position. If so, then how can we even talk about propogating from one position to the next.

Bottom line: [itex] | \vec{x}_0 \rangle [/itex] is a wave and does not have a well-defined position. So how can we talk about positions?

I am seeking clarification on this.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Propogation Amplitude

Loading...

Similar Threads for Propogation Amplitude | Date |
---|---|

I How the probability amplitude is estimated in practice | Apr 13, 2018 |

What does propogation of wave packets mean? | Nov 19, 2012 |

Photon propogator = metric tensor? | Jun 12, 2010 |

Photon propogation | Apr 28, 2010 |

Origin of Feynman Propogator. | Apr 26, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**