Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proportionality and graphs

  1. Jan 27, 2013 #1
    Quote from Wikipedia:

    I've been told by people that a graph with a straight line on it can be proportional but only if it passes through the origin. I fail to see why that's true. If a translation was applied and it was moved 1 unit to the right then, all of a sudden, x is not proportional to y anymore? That doesn't make sense to me.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 27, 2013 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    In math, two quantities are proportional, by definition, if their ratio is constant.
    i.e. if y is proportional to x, then y/x=k - a constant.
    The graph would be y=kx - which is a special case of a straight line.

    If you translated the graph, changing the reference point for measuring x for instance, then the equation of the line is:

    y=k(x+a) and the graph of x vs y no longer passes through the origin.
    The quantities x and y are no longer proportional (y/x=k+ka/x - not a constant) because it is a different x - instead it is x+a that is proportional to y ... which is fair, because x+a was the original quantity.

    However, we can still say that

    y1 = k(x1+a)
    y2 = k(x2+a)

    y2-y1 = k(x2-x1)

    so changes in y are proportional to changes in x.

    If two quantities x and y are related by some line y=mx+c, then the relationship is just called "linear".
     
  4. Jan 27, 2013 #3
    So if the graph is translated left or right, I can still say that "changes in y are proportional to changes in x" but I can't say "y is proportional to x" - is that correct?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Proportionality and graphs
  1. Directly proportional? (Replies: 7)

  2. Proportional Variation (Replies: 2)

Loading...