Prove Upper Darboux Integral

In summary: In order to prove that α = Uf, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a partition P such that U(f, P) < α + ε. So, let ε > 0 be given. We can choose n such that 1/n < ε. Now, let Pn = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ..., 1) be the partition given in the problem statement. We will show that U(f, Pn) < α + ε.Using the hint, we have U(f, Pn∪{s}) - (Mf - mf)δ(Pn) ≥ U(f, Pn), where
  • #1
Yoni V
44
0

Homework Statement


Let ##f## be a bounded function on ##[0,1]##. Let ##P_n## be a partition of ##[0,1]## such that ##P_n = (0,\frac{1}{n},\frac{2}{n},...,1)##. Finally, we define ##\alpha=\inf\{U(f,P_n):n\geq1\}##, where ##U(f,P)## is the upper Darboux sum of ##f## with partition ##P##.

Show that ##\alpha = U_f ##, with ##U_f## being the upper Darboux integral of ##f##, i.e. ##U_f = inf\{U(f,P):P\;is\;a\;partition\;of\;[0,1]\}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We are also given the hint, which we showed in class, that for every partition ##P##,
$$U(f,P\cup \{s \})-(M_f-m_f) \delta (P) \geq U(f,P)$$ where ##s \in [0,1]##, ##M_f=max(f)## on [0,1] (and correspondingly ##m_f##) and ##\delta(P)## is the norm of P.

I really can't make the first step. I was thinking of using a theorem about the upper integral ##\bar I=\lim_{\delta(p) \rightarrow0}U(f,P)##, but I can't get it to take me anywhere...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
for your post! This is an interesting problem and it requires some careful analysis to prove the statement. Let's start by defining some key terms and concepts.

First, let's define what a partition is. A partition of an interval [a, b] is a finite sequence of numbers a = x0 < x1 < ... < xn = b. Each subinterval [xi-1, xi] is called a subinterval of the partition. In this problem, the partition Pn is defined as (0, 1/n, 2/n, ..., 1), which means that the interval [0,1] is divided into n subintervals of equal length. This is important because it allows us to control the size of the subintervals and make them smaller as n gets larger.

Next, let's define what an upper Darboux sum is. The upper Darboux sum of a bounded function f on an interval [a, b] with respect to a partition P is defined as U(f, P) = ∑(xi - xi-1)M(xi), where M(xi) is the maximum value of f on the subinterval [xi-1, xi]. This is essentially the area of rectangles that lie above the graph of f on each subinterval.

Now, let's define the upper Darboux integral. The upper Darboux integral of a bounded function f on an interval [a, b] is defined as Uf = inf{U(f, P): P is a partition of [a, b]}. This is essentially the smallest possible upper Darboux sum for all possible partitions of the interval [a, b].

Now, let's look at the hint given in the problem. It tells us that for any partition P, we have U(f, P∪{s}) - (Mf - mf)δ(P) ≥ U(f, P), where s is a point in [0, 1], Mf and mf are the maximum and minimum values of f on [0, 1], and δ(P) is the norm of P. This is a useful inequality because it tells us that for any partition, the upper Darboux sum will be at least as large as the upper Darboux sum for a partition with an extra point added, minus the difference between the maximum and minimum values of f on [0, 1] times the norm of the partition.

Now, let
 

1. What is the Upper Darboux Integral?

The Upper Darboux Integral is a method for finding the area under a curve by dividing the curve into smaller intervals and calculating the area of rectangles that lie above the curve. It is a type of Riemann sum and is used to approximate the value of a definite integral.

2. How is the Upper Darboux Integral calculated?

The Upper Darboux Integral is calculated by taking the upper sum of the function, which is the sum of the areas of the rectangles that lie above the curve. This is done by multiplying the width of each interval by the maximum value of the function within that interval.

3. What is the difference between the Upper Darboux Integral and the Lower Darboux Integral?

The Upper Darboux Integral takes the maximum value of the function within each interval, while the Lower Darboux Integral takes the minimum value. This means that the Upper Darboux Integral will always give an overestimate of the area under the curve, while the Lower Darboux Integral will always give an underestimate.

4. Why is the Upper Darboux Integral important?

The Upper Darboux Integral is important because it is a useful tool for approximating the value of a definite integral. It allows us to find the area under a curve even if we do not have a function that can be easily integrated.

5. How is the Upper Darboux Integral related to the Riemann Integral?

The Upper Darboux Integral is a type of Riemann sum, which is a way of approximating the value of a definite integral by dividing the interval into smaller subintervals. The Riemann Integral is the limit of these sums as the number of subintervals approaches infinity. Therefore, the Upper Darboux Integral is one method used to calculate the Riemann Integral.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
887
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
611
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
539
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top