Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proving linear dependence (2.0)

  1. Nov 17, 2011 #1
    I have to prove:

    Consider [itex]V=F^{n}[/itex]. Let [itex]\mathbf{v}\in V/\{e_{1},e_{2},...,e_{n}\}[/itex]. Prove [itex]\{e_{1},e_{2},...,e_{n},\mathbf{v}\}[/itex] is a linearly dependent set.

    My attempts at a proof:

    Since [itex]{e_{1},e_{2},...,e_{n}}[/itex] is a basis, it is a linearly independent spanning set. Therefore, any vector [itex]\mathbf{v}\in V[/itex] can be written as a linear combination of [itex]{e_{1},e_{2},...,e_{n}}[/itex]. Therefore, the set [itex]\{e_{1},e_{2},...,e_{n},\mathbf{v}\}[/itex] with [itex]\mathbf{v}\in V[/itex] must be linearly dependent.

    Am I on the right track?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 17, 2011 #2

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Yes, that's ok.
     
  4. Nov 17, 2011 #3

    Deveno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    because...if we write:

    v = v1e1+v2e2+...+vnen,


    then: v1e1+v2e2+...+vnen - 1v

    is a linear combination of {e1,e2,...,en,v} that sums to the 0-vector, and yet not all the coefficients in this sum are 0 (the one for v is -1).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Proving linear dependence (2.0)
  1. Linearly dependent (Replies: 2)

  2. Linear dependence (Replies: 3)

  3. Linear Dependence (Replies: 5)

  4. Linear DEpendence (Replies: 3)

Loading...