Proving that every graph is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph

In summary: H that is r-regular and contains G as an induced subgraph.In summary, to prove that every graph G is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph where r >= D, we can construct a new graph H by adding new vertices and edges to G in a specific way. This will result in an r-regular graph containing G as an induced subgraph.
  • #1
GroupTheory1
7
0

Homework Statement



How would you prove that every graph G is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph where r >= D (the largest degree of the vertices of G)?

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



I can picture the answer for when G itself could be turned into a D-regular graph: make a union of G with a copy of itself and then connect the vertices across the two vertex sets U (from G) and W (from the copy of G) such that u_i and w_j are connected if and only if v_i and v_j would be connected in the original graph in order to turn it into a D-regular graph. However, I cannot figure out how to do it in the general case where, for instance, the order of G may be even or odd and r > D. (I am also having trouble with the just language of graph theory and how to write proofs for it if you couldn't tell.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I would approach this problem by first defining some key concepts and terms to make sure we are on the same page.

First, let's define what an induced subgraph is. An induced subgraph of a graph G is a subset of vertices and edges of G that form a new graph H, where the vertices of H are a subset of the vertices of G and the edges of H are a subset of the edges of G. In other words, H is a graph that can be obtained from G by removing some vertices and edges.

Next, let's define what a regular graph is. A regular graph is a graph where all vertices have the same degree. In this case, we are looking for an r-regular graph, where r is the degree of all vertices in the graph.

Now, let's look at the problem at hand. We want to prove that every graph G is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph where r >= D, the largest degree of the vertices of G.

To prove this, we can use the concept of a degree sequence. The degree sequence of a graph is the list of degrees of all vertices in the graph, arranged in non-increasing order. For example, if a graph has degree sequence (3,3,2,2,1), it means there are two vertices with degree 3, two vertices with degree 2, and one vertex with degree 1.

Now, let's assume that the degree sequence of G is (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n), where d_1 >= d_2 >= ... >= d_n. Since D is the largest degree of the vertices of G, we know that d_1 = D.

To construct an r-regular graph containing G as an induced subgraph, we can simply add vertices and edges to G in a specific way. Let's call this new graph H.

First, we add r - D new vertices to H. These vertices will have degree r, making H an r-regular graph.

Next, we connect each of these new vertices to d_1 - D vertices in G. This ensures that the degree of these new vertices in H is r, and that G is an induced subgraph of H.

We continue this process for each of the remaining vertices in G, adding r - d_i new vertices and connecting them to d_i - d_{i+1} vertices in G. This will
 

1. What is an r-regular graph?

An r-regular graph is a type of graph where every vertex has the same degree or number of edges connected to it. In other words, every vertex in an r-regular graph is connected to exactly r other vertices.

2. Why is it important to prove that every graph is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph?

Proving this statement is important because it helps us better understand the structure and properties of graphs. It also has practical applications in fields such as computer science, where r-regular graphs are used in network design and analysis.

3. How do you prove that every graph is an induced subgraph of an r-regular graph?

The proof for this statement involves constructing an r-regular graph from a given graph. This can be done by adding additional vertices and edges to the given graph in a systematic way, such as by duplicating vertices and connecting them to their respective duplicates in the original graph.

4. Are there any limitations to this statement?

Yes, there are some limitations to this statement. It only applies to finite graphs, meaning that it cannot be applied to infinite graphs. Additionally, the value of r must be at least the maximum degree of the given graph for the proof to hold true.

5. What are the implications of this statement on the study of graph theory?

This statement has significant implications on the study of graph theory. It helps us understand the relationship between different types of graphs and how they can be transformed into each other. It also provides a useful tool for analyzing and solving problems involving graphs by reducing them to r-regular graphs.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
968
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top