# Pulley and particles problem

1. Mar 22, 2014

### Dumbledore211

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Two particles of masses m and 2m lie together on a smooth horizontal table. A string which joins them hangs over the edge and supports a pulley carrying a mass 3m. prove that the acceleration of the latter mass is 9g/17

2. Relevant equations
f=m1g/m1+m2

3. The attempt at a solution
Here, I think by the latter mass they mean is the one carrying 3m. The system is moving down with an acceleration f due to the mass 3m. Will the two particles m and 2m have different acceleration in the same direction?? I am really at a sheer loss as to where I should with this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated....

2. Mar 22, 2014

### paisiello2

It's not clear which one they are talking about but more strangely if there is a rope tying everything together then everything must be accelerating the same.

3. Mar 22, 2014

### dauto

No, everything is not accelerating the same. Each particle has a different acceleration. The problem is clear. They want the acceleration of the third particle - the one with mass = 3m (latter here means the last one).

4. Mar 22, 2014

### Dumbledore211

@dauto So, How should I set up the equations for each mass??? Are they all acceleration in the same direction??? Moreover, what should I take as the starting hypothesis since little information is presented in the problem???

5. Mar 22, 2014

### paisiello2

If each particle has a different acceleration then the string connecting must be stretching or compressing relative to this motion. This would then change the physics of the problem so I can't see how this is possible.

Also I think the problem would have too many unknowns to solve if this were the case.

Is it possible we need to include the mass of the pulley itself?

Last edited: Mar 22, 2014
6. Mar 22, 2014

### dauto

That would be the case if the pulley was fixed. This is a moving pulley we have here
The moving pulley still provides a constraint relating the three accelerations. That constraint is different than the one provided by a fixed pulley (more general)
That would just make the problem harder and since the mass of the pulley was not provided, we must assume it's massless.

7. Mar 22, 2014

### dauto

The problem provides enough information. Start by trying to find the constraint relating the three different accelerations due to the fact that they are all connected to a single pulley (two masses are connected to a string that rolls around the pulleys edge while the third is attached to the center.)

8. Mar 22, 2014

### paisiello2

You are probably right in your interpretation but from the verbal description it doesn't seem to be clear to me at all. For one thing, if the pulley is free to move then the string must be fixed to something on the other end of the pulley. In that case the acceleration of mass 3m would be half of the acceleration of m and 2m.

9. Mar 22, 2014

### dauto

m and 2m are at opposite ends of a string that passes through the pulley (as described in the problem). They have different accelerations.

10. Mar 22, 2014

### paisiello2

You are probably right but the problem didnt say the string passes through the pulley, it only says it supports a pulley. That could mean a number of different things. I suspect the OP left out an accompanying diagram.

11. Mar 22, 2014

### dauto

The problem seems pretty clear to me. There are only two ways to attach a string to a pulley. Either a string goes through the pulley, leaving two lose ends to attach elsewhere, or it connects to the center, leaving only one lose end. The configuration I described is the only one that makes sense. The problem has an additional clue, it gives you the correct answer. I solved the problem as I described and got that same answer, so my interpretation is correct. A diagram would've been helpful, but the problem is solvable as stated.

12. Mar 22, 2014

### paisiello2

You must be right then but it wasn't clear to me and I dont think it was clear to the OP. If "support" can mean "pass through" then so can "tied".

The problem as interpreted by you is also 3 dimensional. You then have to make a number of assumptions about the geometry. The problem could have been better reformulated as a two dimensional problem and still get the same concepts across.

13. Mar 23, 2014

### Dumbledore211

Does the problem say the third mass is attached to the center of the pulley or the other end of the string that holds the pulley??? I am still in the dark as to how I should set up the tension and accelerations for each masses??? The pulley is mass less and the string is inelastic. So, It definitely rules out the possibility of the extension and compression of the string...

14. Mar 23, 2014

### paisiello2

According to dauto he gets the right answer by taking the 3m mass attached to the center of the pulley.

First step is to set up the acceleration relationship between each mass.

2nd step is to do the free body diagram for each mass.

15. Mar 23, 2014

### Dumbledore211

The equation for the latter mass in this case is 3mg- T= 3mf3
The equation for both the masses which is 2m in this case is T=2mf1+ mf2
Correct me if I am wrong. If there are three accelerations for each particle then we need three equations to solve for the three different variables but we only have two

16. Mar 23, 2014

### paisiello2

What are f1, f2, and f3?

Also T is different for each portion.

17. Mar 23, 2014

### Dumbledore211

Are m and 2m are attached to the two opposite ends of the string according to dauto??? Sorry, f1, f2 and f3 are actually a1, 12 and a3

18. Mar 23, 2014

### paisiello2

Yes, so the string is tied to m, goes over the table edge and down, loops through the pulley that carries 3m, comes back up and over the table edge again, and then finally ties back to 2m.

So we should have a total of 5 unknowns: a1, a2, a3, T1, and T2.

We can get 3 equations from ∑F=Ma for each mass. And we can get two more from relating a3 to a1 and a2 for the pulley system.

19. Mar 23, 2014

### haruspex

The tensions must be the same, and there's only one equation relating the three accelerations.

20. Mar 23, 2014

### paisiello2

OK, I agree we can set the tensions to be the same since the pulley is massless and I agree there is only one kinematic relationship between all 3 accelerations.

Last edited: Mar 23, 2014