Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
Materials Engineering
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
Materials Engineering
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Is 532nm the Optimum Wavelength for Atmospheric Particle Tracking?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Klystron, post: 6434448, member: 614295"] From the article: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1608740596249.png"]274965[/ATTACH] The author states that optimum wavelength to track atmospheric particles determined system design; thus, lidar instead of radar. Average pulse energy refers to multiple pulses over time with attention to beam expansion and divergence at intended target ranges. Consider also the [URL='https://www.radartutorial.eu/01.basics/Maximum%20Unambiguous%20Range.en.html']maximum unambiguous range[/URL] of pulsed transmit/receive systems. This allows one to optimize PRF/PRT (pulse repetition frequency and its reciprocal, pulse repetition time) depending on required range and vice-versa. The linked calculator applies to radar, lidar and some acoustic models. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Is 532nm the Optimum Wavelength for Atmospheric Particle Tracking?
Back
Top