Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Python: (a,b,c) vs [a,b,c]

  1. May 19, 2006 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Hopefully someone (chroot!?!?) wil be able to answer this simple Python question.

    I am looking at a code written by someone else and there are those two enigmatic statements one after the other:


    Ok, besides the obvious question of why not initializing directly the list "pathlist" to 0,0,0,0 (it's hard to know what was going in someone's else mind when they were writing the code so I don't worry too much about that point...sometimes code are rewritten and modified over and over before reaching their final form and not everything is rewritten to be the simplest), I have this more to the point question:

    what is the difference between defining something within parenthesis (...) and within square brackets [..]? I think that in the second case we are dealing with a list object so that all the corresponding methods (like append) can be used. But what kind of object is (....) ? I am not sure if it simply a string, and if it is I am not sure what the difference is between a string and a list (different methods are defined?)

    Thanks in advance!

  2. jcsd
  3. May 19, 2006 #2
    Hi Patrick,

    Parentheses define a "tuple", square brackets a "list". They're both superficially similar to arrays in Fortran, C, etc. Tuples are immutable. That is, once you've created a tuple, you can't change it. You can't add or delete elements, and you cannot assign to elements.

    For example,
    >>> a = (1,2,3)
    >>> a[1] = 3
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "<pyshell#1>", line 1, in -toplevel-
    a[1] = 3
    TypeError: object does not support item assignment
    >>> print a
    (1, 2, 3)

    With a list, one can assign new values to elements, add or remove elements, and so on.

    >>> b = [1,2,3]
    >>> b[1] = 4
    >>> print b
    [1, 4, 3]
    >>> b.append(6)
    >>> print b
    [1, 4, 3, 6]

    A string is a different type. You can find out what attributes an object has by typing dir( <object>):
    >>> dir(a)
    ['__add__', '__class__', '__contains__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__eq__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__getitem__', '__getnewargs__', '__getslice__', '__gt__', '__hash__', '__init__', '__iter__', '__le__', '__len__', '__lt__', '__mul__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__rmul__', '__setattr__', '__str__']

    And you can find out its type--"introspection":
    >>> a.__class__
    <type 'tuple'>
    >>> a.__class__.__name__

    Very powerful.

    Hope that helps.
  4. May 20, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Wow!! I appreciate it very much Tim! That is not just helpful, it is enlightening!

    Thanks a lot for taking the time to post this.

    That brings me to another point. I saw in the program (written by someone else, as I mentioned) the following: sometimes a list is appended to another list in the following way:


    so it seems as if a list must be turned into a tuple before being appended to another list? Is that the correct interpretation?
    (and is there a reason for the double parenthesis or one of the two is redundant?)

    thank you very much!

  5. May 20, 2006 #4
    List elements can be of any type, including lists:
    Code (Text):
    >>> mylist = [1, "Four score", [1,1,2,3,5], ("j","k","l")]
    The parentheses that I've "underlined" are redundant only if there's nothing after tuple( listNumberTwo). Surrounding a sequence of objects with parens is one way of declaring a tuple; the other way is to use the "tuple( sequence, of, things)" construct.

    Suppose the whole thing looks like this:
    Code (Text):
    listOne.append(  ( tuple( listNumberTwo),  3.14159, "Today is the greatest") )
    This statement means:
    1. Convert listNTwo to a tuple
    2. Make a second tuple out of the first tuple, the floating point # 3.14159, and the string
    3. append that second tuple to listOne

    It could have been written
    Code (Text):
    listOne.append(  tuple( tuple( listNumberTwo),  3.14159, "Today is the greatest") )
    One of the very powerful features of Python is this ability of containers can hold a mixture of any data types (even functions!). You can do this in C (of course, since Python is written in C), but it takes a bit of ingenuity, and if you do it well, you'll probably come up with a language like Python.

  6. May 20, 2006 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Thanks Tim! That is very useful! I really appreciate it very much .

    That makes sense now.

    But since one can append a list to another list, then there must be a reason to convert it to a tuple before appending, right? My guess is that if a list "listTwo" is converted to a tuple before being appended to "listOne", then each element of listTwo becomes an element of listOne, right? For example, if listOne is initially [1,2,3] and one appends tuple([4.5.6]) then ListOne becomes [1,2,3,4,5,6] and then one can access each element as a separate entry, whereas appending the list [4,5,6] would result into listOne becoming [1,2,3,[4,5,6]] which would be quite a different beast. Is that correct? Then I would understand why the guy who wrote the program had to convert all those lists into tuples before appending.

    Thanks a whole lot!!

  7. May 20, 2006 #6
    Nope. The tuple formed from the elements of list two becomes a single element in list 1.
    >>> one = [1,2,3]
    >>> twoL = [4,5,6]
    >>> twoT = tuple( twoL)
    >>> print twoT
    (4, 5, 6)
    >>> one.append( twoT)
    >>> print one
    [1, 2, 3, (4, 5, 6)]
    >>> print one[3]
    (4, 5, 6)
    I'm not sure why the original programmer chose to use a tuple. Typically, you do that to make the thing sort of "read-only".

    By the way, are you using a Python shell to check this out? One of the great things about Python versus C, Fortran, etc. is you can always try out a bit of code and immediately see what it does in the interpreter.
  8. May 20, 2006 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Hi Tim. Thank you very much, once again!
    And thanks for the suggestion concerning using the Python shell. I have it installed on my desktop but I keep forgetting about using it to test how things work.

    It is always confusing to try to understand someone else's code especially when one does not know the language. So I appreciate your comments. it helps me move along instead of staying stuck on details.

    I will surely have more Python questions as I dig in the program more and start writing my own code so I hope you will stick around!

    Many thanks again for your time!


Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Python: (a,b,c) vs [a,b,c]
  1. Learning C/C++ (Replies: 5)

  2. C++ vector (Replies: 3)

  3. Learning C++ (Replies: 9)

  4. A C problem (Replies: 9)