Hi guys. I'm apprently stuck on the basics of the analysis. On the proof that Q lacks least upper boundary property to be precise.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The example I have uses a set A (p in Q | p > 0, p^2 < 2)

then q is defined as [tex]p - \frac{p^{2} - 2}{p + 2}[/tex] . Then they show that if p is in A then q is in A too and p < q and so on. All very simple.

What I can't understand is where the expression for q comes from - logically: why p^{2}- 2 and over p + 2. I see it works, but I need to know why :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Q and least-upper boundary.

Loading...

Similar Threads for least upper boundary | Date |
---|---|

B Doubt regarding least upper bound? | Mar 2, 2016 |

About definition of 'Bounded above' and 'Least Upper Bound Property' | Mar 16, 2012 |

About least upper bound and ordered set | Mar 13, 2012 |

Greatest lower bound/least upper bound in Q | Nov 11, 2011 |

Least upper bound axiom | Jan 5, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**