I presented a way to derive Coulomb force via the canonical mechanism.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

One uses Coulomb gauge

[tex]\partial_i A^i = 0[/tex]

derives

[tex]\Delta A_0 = -4\pi\,\rho[/tex]

which can be inverted formally

[tex]A_0 = -4\pi\,\Delta^{-1}\,\rho[/tex]

and calculates the interaction term in the Hamiltonian density

[tex]\mathcal{H}_\text{int} = - 4 \pi \, \rho \,\Delta^{-1}\,\rho + \ldots[/tex]

where ... represents the coupling of the 3-potential A to the 3-vector current density.

Using the Greens function of the Laplacian one immediately finds the well-known Coulomb potential term (from which in classical electrodynamics the Coulomb force for point charges can be derived).

[tex]H_\text{int} = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3} d^3r\,d^3r^\prime \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r})\,\rho(\mathbf{r}^\prime)}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^\prime|} + \ldots[/tex]

That means that the Coulomb potential can be derived w/o using the dynamical equations of the theory and w/o any restriction like electrostatics.

Problem:

In principle I can generalize this as follows: I add a 'background' field a(x), i.e. a harmonic function

[tex]\Delta \, a = 0[/tex]

[tex]A_0 = -4\pi\,\Delta^{-1}\,\rho + a[/tex]

[tex]\mathcal{H}_\text{int} = - 4 \pi \, \rho \,\Delta^{-1}\,\rho - 4 \pi \, \rho a + \ldots[/tex]

Questions:

1) what would be the physical meaning of a(x) - which is source-free, i.e. neither generated by charges nor by dynamical el.-mag. fields?

2) are there mathematical reasons for a(x) = 0

3) what would it mean to introduce such fields in the canonical quantization of QED?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# QED in Coulomb gauge

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**