In the Klein-Gordon equation (spin 0), the mass dependence is (only) through [itex]m^2[/itex], whereas in the Dirac equation (spin 1/2) it's through [itex]m[/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Does this mean that for spin 0 particles, we can just as well describe them as having negative mass without changing any of the physics (whereas for the spin 1/2 particle there would be a difference)?

Perhaps this is simply another way of saying that spin 0 particles are their own antiparticles (?), whereas spin 1/2 particles are not (in the Dirac sea picture)? However, that can't really be the case, since we also have [itex]m^2[/itex] in the Proca equation, which would mean that all spin 1 particles are their own antiparticles, which is not the case.

So what does these different types of mass-dependence signify?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# QFT with negative mass

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**