In the Klein-Gordon equation (spin 0), the mass dependence is (only) through [itex]m^2[/itex], whereas in the Dirac equation (spin 1/2) it's through [itex]m[/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Does this mean that for spin 0 particles, we can just as well describe them as having negative mass without changing any of the physics (whereas for the spin 1/2 particle there would be a difference)?

Perhaps this is simply another way of saying that spin 0 particles are their own antiparticles (?), whereas spin 1/2 particles are not (in the Dirac sea picture)? However, that can't really be the case, since we also have [itex]m^2[/itex] in the Proca equation, which would mean that all spin 1 particles are their own antiparticles, which is not the case.

So what does these different types of mass-dependence signify?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# QFT with negative mass

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**