QM Interpretations

  • Thread starter dm4b
  • Start date

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,006
2,910
Quantum mechanics is not the same as classical physics. In fact it is radically different. Unfortunately, your "common sense" is really "classical sense" and your "logic" is "classical logic". What you are saying is that quantum events should behave like classical events. We know this is not true.
Don't make quantum mechanics unnnecessarily weird!

All quantum physics obeys classical logic. We use it to think about quantuym mechanics, to infer correctly implications of quantum mechanics, to prove theorems about it. The so-called ''quantum logic'' is completely useless for any of these tasks, except for some extremely simple experiments.
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,006
2,910
After reading through these posts it sounds like there are some interpretations I wasn't familar with.

Anybody know of a good resource where one can read up on all the current interpretations? Thanks!
SUAC = shut up and calculate

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/
(and links there at the bottom to ''Related entries'')

Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics

The same interpretation usually also has many variants.....
 
359
4

Related Threads for: QM Interpretations

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
101
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
840
Top