Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

QM vs. null hypothesis

  1. Aug 14, 2009 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 14, 2009 #2

    DrChinese

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Your question is not clear. Your last reference is from 1961 so is a bit dated to say the least (pre-Bell). Could you be more specific?
     
  4. Aug 14, 2009 #3
    I try to rephrase:

    How can we choose "safe" critical value or significance level in a framework of QT when applying the null hypothesis?

    Does this make any sense?
     
  5. Aug 14, 2009 #4

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    In most sciences about 2 standard deviations (95% confidence) is traditional. Modern physics, however, tends to use much higher levels, like 5 standard deviations (99.9999% confidence).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: QM vs. null hypothesis
  1. Penrose vs. QM? (Replies: 3)

  2. QM vs. SR (Replies: 19)

  3. QM vs SR (Replies: 61)

  4. QFT vs QM 101 (Replies: 67)

Loading...