Why do irrational numbers appear in quantum physics?

In summary, quantum physics is coming up with many irrational results, most likely because of the units used. The Planck constant is not the same as the Planck length, but it is still a number that is important in quantum physics.
  • #1
JJRittenhouse
44
0
This is a question I've had for some time, but didn't think to ask whenever I was around someone who might have been able to answer it.

If energy and matter are made of quanta, then why is quantum physics coming up with so many irrational results instead of integral ones?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Generally, unless the question is 'how many quanta compose this [insert simple physical object]?' it comes down to a question of units. For example, our use of joules (or pounds even more so) is based on practical concerns in the macroscopic world; 1 J is a convenient size for day-to-day activities. It makes sense, then, that trying to use joules to describe quantum phenomenon doesn't yield nice numbers like '2', or '10.'

Thats why physicist often use 'natural units,' based on things like the speed of light (c) and Planck's constant (h) being set equal to unity. In that case, results will often be 'nice' numbers. Still, however, due to the frequently statistical nature of the work (e.g. addressing 'expectation values' and 'ensemble averages') lots of fractions and geometrical factors come into play.
 
  • #3
Energy of a particle is a continuous function of its velocity. If velocities are not quantized then energies of particles are also not quantized. Planck constant is the quantum of action, not of energy.
 
  • #4
zhermes said:
and Planck's constant

I know that the Planck constant isn't the same as the Planck length, but this is in the topic of my question. I've seen many questions about the nature of the Planck length, most of them assure that this is not an actual minimal limit to size, but more of meaningfulness, that under this length, nothing can be determined...

Is the Planck length an actual "quanta" of space, or is it more like a quanta of information? (not being able to get meaningful results beyond that size)
 
  • #5
Planck length is just a number calculated from the values of known constants. One third of the Planck length is as good a number as Planck length itself. But not everyone will agree with my statement.
 
  • #6
Thanks guys.
 

1. What are quanta?

Quanta are the smallest measurable units of energy in a physical system. They are the building blocks of matter and energy, and they behave according to the laws of quantum mechanics.

2. How are irrational numbers related to quanta?

Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. They are used in quantum mechanics to describe the energy levels of particles, as these levels are often represented by irrational numbers.

3. Can irrational numbers be observed in nature?

Yes, irrational numbers can be observed in nature, particularly in the behavior of particles at the quantum level. They are also used in various mathematical models to explain natural phenomena.

4. What is the significance of irrational numbers in science?

Irrational numbers play a crucial role in many scientific fields, including quantum mechanics, chaos theory, and fractal geometry. They help us understand the complex and unpredictable nature of the universe.

5. How do irrational numbers challenge our understanding of the physical world?

Irrational numbers, with their infinitely long and non-repeating decimal representations, challenge our traditional understanding of measurement and precision. They also challenge our perception of reality, as they describe phenomena that cannot be fully explained by classical physics.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
3
Replies
85
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
78
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top