1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quantum Hamiltonian II

  1. Sep 6, 2005 #1
    Let be a Hamiltonian in the form H=T+V we don,t know if V is real or complex..all we know is that if E_n is an energy also E*_n=E_k will be another energy, my question is if this would imply V is real...

    my proof is taking normalized Eigenfunctions we would have that:

    [tex](<\phi_{n}|H|\phi_{n}>)*=<\phi_{k}|H|\phi_{k}> [/tex]

    so the expected value of T is always real,then we would have the identity with the complex part b(x) of the potential:

    [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx(|\phi_{n}|^{2}+|\phi_{k}|^{2})b(x)=0 [/tex]

    for every k,and n so necessarily b=0 so the potential is real and all the eigenfunctions would be real.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 7, 2005 #2

    Galileo

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I find the question a bit weird. The energy of a system is an observable and its corresponding operator is the Hamiltonian and is thus hermitian which implies having real eigenvalues. If you take V nonreal H isn't Hermitian anymore.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Quantum Hamiltonian II
  1. Projectiles II (Replies: 16)

  2. Work II (Replies: 2)

  3. Lawsuit II (Replies: 5)

Loading...