1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quantum mechanics question.

  1. Apr 20, 2004 #1
    I was recently given a problem that asked me to show that the classical velocity of a particle is given by:

    [tex] v = \frac{d \langle x\rangle}{dt} = \frac{1}{m} \langle({\bf p}-q{\bf A})\rangle[/tex]

    The expectation value of the time derivative of x is given by:

    [tex]\langle v\rangle = \int{\Psi ^{*} (x \frac{d}{dt}) \Psi[/tex]

    So then I just work this out, and what do I do after that? How do I get from here to the form the problem is asking for?
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I assume p and q are the "generalized coordinates" (p is "x-position" and q is momentum) but what is A?

    Also you are using "v" to mean two different things. In the first equation, v is the "classical" velocity while in the second it is the velocity "operator".
    In other words, the v in the first equation IS the <v> of the second.
  4. Apr 21, 2004 #3
    I'm sorry, this material is new to me and I'm not sure what is "standard" notation and what isn't. The question was asked in the context of gauge invariance in electrodynamics(that's what we're discussing in my class right now), so I believe the whole expression "p-qA" is the substitution:

    [tex]\bf{p} = \frac{\hbar}{i} \bigtriangledown \to \bf{p} - q\bf{A}[/tex]

    so p is momentum, q is charge, and A is the vector potential. We also have the substitution:

    [tex]i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \rightarrow i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t} - q\phi[/tex]

    Where q is again the charge and phi is the scaler potential.

    So the schrodinger equation should look like:

    [tex]i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}= \left[\frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\bigtriangledown + qA\right)^2+q\phi\right]\Psi[/tex]
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2004
  5. Apr 21, 2004 #4

    Dr Transport

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Start with the commutator [tex] [H,x] [/tex], from there you should be able to work out the solution.

  6. Apr 21, 2004 #5

    So the hamiltonian in this case is
    [tex]\left[\frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\bigtriangledown + qA\right)^2+q\phi\right][/tex]

    So if I take the commutator of that with x:
    [tex]\left[\left[\frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\bigtriangledown + qA\right)^2+q\phi\right],x\right][/tex]

    I should be able to figure out the time derivative of <x> by

    [tex]\frac{d\langle x \rangle}{dt}=\frac{i}{\hbar}\left\langle\left[\left[\frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\bigtriangledown + qA\right)^2+q\phi\right],x\right]\right\rangle+\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t}[/tex]

    Right? I just want to make sure I've got the idea right before I try to go and do the math. Thanks for the help guys.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Quantum mechanics question.