Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Qubit spin convention

  1. Feb 27, 2013 #1
    This is a bit embarrassing, but by convention does [itex]|0> = (1,0)^T[/itex] and
    [itex]|1>=(0,1)^T[/itex], where we are in the basis of the eigenvectors of [itex]\sigma_{z}[/itex]?
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 27, 2013 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The notation is a bit misleading, since [itex]|0\rangle[/itex] is most commonly used to denote the ground state of a system. However, in the absence of an external field, both spin states have the same energy. The justification for using the notation is the convention that in a communications protocol, one state must be chosen to signal binary 0 vs binary 1 for the other state. There's no particular reason to choose one over the other, but indeed the spin up state is conventionally chosen to be the off bit, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit#Physical_representation
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Qubit spin convention Date
A Qubit error rate of QKD BB84 protocol Jan 16, 2018
I Does 'Phase Inversion' grow exponentially? Dec 13, 2017
Controlled - NOT gate Nov 7, 2015
Spins and Qubits Oct 25, 2015
Spins as qubits Nov 2, 2009