- #1

- 2,544

- 3

than [itex] 2^{\aleph_0} [/itex] sides. maybe some crazy fractal.

and if not in the plane would we maybe have to go to infinite dimensional space.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter cragar
- Start date

- #1

- 2,544

- 3

than [itex] 2^{\aleph_0} [/itex] sides. maybe some crazy fractal.

and if not in the plane would we maybe have to go to infinite dimensional space.

- #2

- 22,089

- 3,297

Anyway, we have that [itex]\{(x,y)~\vert~x,y\in \mathbb{R}\}[/itex] has cardinality [itex]2^{\aleph_0}[/itex]. So your figure would have to repeat its "sides" infinitely often.

- #3

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 9,794

- 4,398

Define "side".

Well, if a "side" is an ordered pair of vertices then you'd need more than [itex]2^{\aleph_0}[/itex] possible values for each vertex in order to have more than [itex]2^{\aleph0}[/itex] possible ordered pairs of vertices.

That sounds like you need a space whose dimensionality is larger than the cardinality of R.

- #4

- 2,544

- 3

ya it seems like you couldn't do it in the x-y plane. it does seem like I

have R^R choices though for possible shapes.

Share: